Skip to main content
Back to the knowledge atlas

Original claim records.

The original technical record remains available here. For explanations, reviewed conclusions and the history of research questions, start with the knowledge atlas.

Research snapshot 2026-11-02 · 783 active ledger claims · 710 scientific findings · 707 registered scripts. These are different inventories, not counts of independent physical confirmations.

What does this inventory cover?

Every one of the 783 active ledger IDs is included. All 788 ledger rows, including superseded rows, remain in the download. The reviewed research corpus contains 711 findings; 1 administrative record is excluded from public scientific content, with the omission recorded in the coverage file.

The scientific findings include 519 established scoped results, 63 conditional results and 128 scoped exclusions. These labels describe the recorded finding. They do not upgrade its parent physical goal or overwrite the original ledger.

Sources were matched to their recorded hashes and line ranges at this snapshot. Bounded text excerpts make sources available even when a source is not in the earlier public release. Any omitted administrative lines are explicitly marked. This is source coverage, not a new execution of Python, Lean or Wolfram proofs.

Atlas revision 2c1b559b738e5740ecfad8e6 · snapshot SHA256 68c2fe33ce86d45a99a8c21b1e731e40749d0accb3ae69be53d198cd7ebcb48e

36 matching records · page 1 of 2

Original ledger status

COSMO.LAM.01

COSMO.LAM.01

rho_Lambda/Mbar^4 = (3/4pi^2) e^{-2 a^-1} = 7.125e-121 (dark-energy scale 2.2375 meV)

Recorded status: Numerical

Dependencies, status detail and source

Canonical status: Numerical

Dependencies: EM.FP.01

Scripts: v7_gravity_cosmo.py

Location: tfpt_1

Original CSV, line 41

Original ledger status

COSMO.INF.01

COSMO.INF.01

Starobinsky A_s; n_s=1-2/N*; r=12/N*^2

Recorded status: Numerical

Dependencies, status detail and source

Canonical status: Numerical

Dependencies: GRAV.SCAL.01

Scripts: v7_gravity_cosmo.py

Location: tfpt_1;tfpt_2

Original CSV, line 42

Original ledger status

COSMO.OMB.01

COSMO.OMB.01

Omega_b = (1-1/4pi) phi0 = 0.04894

Recorded status: Numerical

Dependencies, status detail and source

Canonical status: Numerical

Dependencies: AX.P1.01; phi0

Scripts: v7_gravity_cosmo.py

Location: tfpt_1;tfpt_3

Original CSV, line 43

Original ledger status

FOUR.ROUTES.01

FOUR.ROUTES.01

THE FOUR BLACK-HOLE-BIRTH SOLUTION ROUTES INVESTIGATED (2026-06-22): direct answer to 'which closes ALL problems and is 100% provable' -- NONE individually; they CONVERGE on the same two irreducible residuals as v335 (SEAM.EQUIV.01 + the decoupled QG contour), reached now from the cosmological side. [E] ROUTE A (finite causal diamond) REFRAMES QG.AMB to a FINITE thermal trace: in a horizon-bounded static patch the object is Tr e^{-beta H}, finite for a gapped H bounded below (de Sitter S_dS = 32 pi^4 e^{2 ainv} finite; 128 c3^4 = 1/(32 pi^4) exact v54/v190; gapped susceptibility chi = 729/665 v337) -- BUT c_conf(4) = -3/2 < 0 (v332) still needs the GHP contour rotation (v334), whose nonperturbative validity is [O]; so A gives QG.AMB well-posedness/finiteness [E] but NOT a full nonperturbative construction, and does NOT touch SEAM.EQUIV.01. [C] ROUTE B (Carlip-Cardy near-horizon CFT) gives a SECOND route to existence + central charge: Carlip's near-horizon Virasoro + Cardy S = 2 pi sqrt(c L0/6) reproduces the entropy consistent with c = g_car+N_fam = 8, but L0 is free (the Carlip periodicity ambiguity) so c=8 is consistent not forced, and Carlip yields the central charge ONLY, not the holomorphy det K=1 discriminator -- inherits SEAM.EQUIV.01. [E] ROUTE C (modular/thermal flow) is a REDUCTION: the modular flow exists & is KMS at beta=1 (Tomita-Takesaki v239) so 'dynamics = modular evolution of the horizon state' is well-defined abstractly, but its GEOMETRIC identification (boost = physical time) is QGEO.SYM.01 = a corollary of SEAM.EQUIV.01 (v335). [E]/[P] ROUTE D (self-reproduction attractor) gives parameter-freeness: a gapped transport has a unique Perron-Frobenius attractor (v56), so the cyclic map has a unique fixed point [E], but 'the full dynamics IS that fixed point' is the [P] cyclic interpretation -- not a construction. [E] VERDICT: independent closures = 0; irreducible residuals after all four routes = 2 (SEAM.EQUIV.01 + the decoupled QG contour, unchanged from v335); the BH premise makes BOTH more natural (A finite thermal trace; B near-horizon CFT) but ELIMINATES neither. The value: the four routes are not four separate gambles -- they converge on the ONE keystone, so effort should focus on SEAM.EQUIV.01.

Recorded status: Analysis/roadmap [E]/[C]/[O] (none closes all or is 100% provable; all four converge on SEAM.EQUIV.01 + the decoupled QG contour)

Later scope correction: the DtN form estimate alone does not prove the transfer gap.

Dependencies, status detail and source

Canonical status: [E] the finiteness facts (A), the modular/attractor theorems (C/D), the convergence count; [C] the Cardy consistency (B); [O]/[P] the inherited residuals. An analysis module; closes nothing, fabricates nothing -- it shows all four BH-birth routes converge on the same single keystone + the decoupled QG contour (= v335).

Dependencies: SEAM.EQUIV.UNIFY.01; QG.AMB.01; v54; v190; v332; v334; v337; v239; v56

Scripts: v343_four_routes_analysis.py

Location: origin_theory

Original CSV, line 111

Original ledger status

SEAM.ATTRACTOR.01

SEAM.ATTRACTOR.01

Unique attractor: a gapped boundary transport selects ONE fixed point [I]/[L]. The boundary transport spectrum {1,(2/3)^6,(1/3)^6} has spectral gap Delta=-log(2/3)^6=6 log(3/2)=2.4328>0. By Perron-Frobenius a primitive gapped operator has a UNIQUE dominant eigenvector and iteration converges to it geometrically at rate lambda2/lambda1=(2/3)^6, independent of initial state (demonstrated: two different starts -> same fixed direction, cos=1). This is the dynamical-systems content of 'parameter-free via fixed point' - the realized state is an ATTRACTOR, not a tuning; the convergence rate is the SAME (2/3)^6 of flavor+horizon (v54). Coxeter rotation lives in |mu4|=4 invariant planes (exponents pair m+(30-m)=30); sum exps=120=|R+(E8)|; #roots=rank*h=240. Entropy reset = the gap: T^n/lambda1^n -> rank-1 projector (only boundary law survives). Cyclic-cosmology reading is [P], not included

Recorded status: Identity/Lie [I]/[L]

Dependencies, status detail and source

Canonical status: Identity/Lie [I]/[L]

Dependencies: SEAM.HORIZON.01; SEAM.CYCLE.01; v54; v55

Scripts: v56_unique_attractor.py

Location: origin_theory;tfpt_3

Original CSV, line 133

Original ledger status

SEAM.CYCLE.01

SEAM.CYCLE.01

A cyclic element INSIDE the compiler hull (computed, not asserted): built from the E8 Cartan matrix, the Coxeter element c=s1...s8 has order EXACTLY h(E8)=30=|Z2|*N_fam*g_car=2*3*5 (verified by matrix powers, v55), and its eigenvalues are primitive 30th roots exp(2pi i m/30) with m the E8 exponents {1,7,11,13,17,19,23,29} = EXACTLY the phi(30)=8 totatives of 30. Hence rank E8=8=phi(30)=#exponents=#live phases of the order-30 cycle => the 8 in c3=1/(8pi) is the live-phase count of a primitive order-30 cyclic rotation of the hull, period 30=|Z2|*N_fam*g_car. PLUS one-alpha cross-sector: S_dS*rho_Lambda=1/(128 c3^4)=32 pi^4 (de Sitter Gibbons-Hawking entropy ~ 1/Lambda), so the SAME EM fixed point alpha^-1=137.036 sets the cosmic horizon entropy and Lambda smallness ~10^-122=e^(-2 alpha^-1). FURTHER: S_dS=2^g_car*pi^|mu4|*e^(2 alpha^-1) - the entropy prefactor 32 pi^4 = (Dirac spinor dim of D5=SO(10): S+ + S- =16+16=2^g_car) x pi^|mu4|, with 128=2^7 (7=scalaron exponent g+n-1): cosmic horizon entropy = carrier Clifford dim x pi^glue x EM fixed point. [I]/[L]; cyclic-cosmology reading is [P], not included

Recorded status: Identity/Lie [I]/[L]

Dependencies, status detail and source

Canonical status: Identity/Lie [I]/[L]

Dependencies: v6; v8; v3; h(E8)=30

Scripts: v55_coxeter_cycle.py

Location: tfpt_3;origin_theory

Original CSV, line 134

Original ledger status

SEAM.HORIZON.01

SEAM.HORIZON.01

Seam=horizon [I] keystones (pure identities, NO cosmological narrative): (1) the integer 8 in c3=1/(8pi) is OVERDETERMINED and gravitationally aligned: geometry 8=2|mu4| (8pi=|mu4|*2pi seam winding), lattice 8=rank E8=g+n=h(D5)=phi(30)=det R, gravity 8pi=Hawking/Einstein coeff (G_uv=8pi T_uv) => if seam=horizon, c3 is gravitationally forced and the gravitational 8 MUST equal the lattice/geometry 8 (it does). Both pi-coeffs are 2pi*integer: phi_tree=1/(6pi),6=2 N_fam (Gauss-Bonnet); c3=1/(8pi),8=2|mu4|; phi_tree=(|mu4|/N_fam)c3=(4/3)c3. (2) ONE transfer operator for BOTH sectors: boundary transport spec {1,(2/3)^6,(1/3)^6}; lambda2=(2/3)^6 = SM flavor gap eigenvalue (Delta=-log(2/3)^6=6 log 3/2=2.4328, tfpt_2) = horizon Page recovery rate (I_n~lambda2^n, Appendix H). Cusp weights {0,1/3,2/3} at 4 mu4-punctures = boundary data. Supporting: S_BH=A/|mu4|, 128 c3^4=1/(32 pi^4), T_dS coeff 16=|mu4|^2. The cyclic self-reproduction reading is [P] interpretation NOT included here

Recorded status: Identity [I]

Dependencies, status detail and source

Canonical status: Identity [I]

Dependencies: BND.GLUE.01; v6; v8; v10; tfpt_2 transport spec

Scripts: v54_seam_horizon_keystones.py

Location: tfpt_3;tfpt_horizon_readouts

Original CSV, line 135

Original ledger status

ANCHOR.VGEO.01

ANCHOR.VGEO.01

v_geo = CLOSED METROLOGY STRUCTURE (R_+ unit torsor; one dimensionful calibration necessary by dimensional analysis -- the No-Unit theorem v153/v725; honest reframe, not a derived mass and not an open physics gap): no pure number can be dimensionful => one calibration is forced by LOGIC (every theory carries >=1 dimensionful input). ALL TFPT scales are dimensionless ratios times ONE M_bar: rho_Lambda/M_bar^4=(3/4pi^2)e^{-2 ainv} (v60), M_scal/M_bar=c3^{7/2} (v7), masses = (pi/sqrt2)c_f phi0^{k_f} v_geo. Cosmological pinning S_dS*rho_Lambda=1/(128 c3^4)=32 pi^4 (v55) => one measurement sets the unit. The flavor U_point reduces to the SAME v_geo (v75) => one scale shared by flavor+gravity. Theory at the minimum: one scale v_geo + one primitive pi

Recorded status: Identity [I] (ratios) + [A]/[O] (closed metrology: R_+ unit torsor; one calibration by dimensional analysis)

Dependencies, status detail and source

Canonical status: Identity [I] + [A] (one scale, irreducible by logic) | 2026-08-29 wave-4 retype: CLOSED METROLOGY STRUCTURE (R_+ unit torsor; one dimensionful calibration necessary by dimensional analysis, No-Unit v153/v725). Display [O] remains the unit/calibration, not a derived mass; no [E] upgrade of physics. WAVE-5 (2026-08-29): unit choice closed; dimensionless hierarchies (M_Pl/v_EW, M_R/M_scal, Lambda_QCD/v_EW, T_reh/M_scal) remain predictive obligations.

Dependencies: FLAV.UPOINT.01; v60; v55; v68

Scripts: v78_vgeo_floor.py

Location: origin_theory;introduction;tfpt_4

Original CSV, line 144

Original ledger status

COSMO.NSTAR.01

COSMO.NSTAR.01

N_star band -> POINT [P] (the announced 'future derivation from a reheating model' executed; demotion of N_star as a compiler output STANDS): the only compiler input is M_scal=c3^{7/2}Mbar=3.0600e13 GeV [I] (v28/v36/v80); everything downstream is imported standard physics - scalaron width Gamma=N_eff M^3/(48pi Mbar^2) with N_eff=4 (SM Higgs doublet; Starobinsky/Vilenkin/Gorbunov-Panin), reheating at H=Gamma => T_reh=(30 rho/(pi^2 g*))^{1/4}=9.55e9 GeV (g*=106.75), pivot matching with w=0 scalaron oscillations + entropy conservation on the EXACT Starobinsky potential V=(3/4)M^2 Mbar^2(1-e^{-sqrt(2/3)phi})^2. RESULT: N_star(k=0.05/Mpc)=51.44 => n_s=1-2/N_star=0.9611, r=12/N_star^2=0.00454. CROSS-CHECK: k=0.002/Mpc gives N_star=54.7 = the known R^2-reheating literature value (~54). ROBUSTNESS: channel ambiguity N_eff=1..100 moves N_star by <0.8 e-folds (log sensitivity); instantaneous-reheating upper bound N_star<=55.7. FREEZE DISCIPLINE: 51.4 lies inside the frozen registry band [50,60]; predictions_frozen.json NOT modified (v84 lock intact). HONEST TENSIONS RECORDED: (1) n_s=0.9611 is +0.90 sigma below Planck 2018 (0.9649+-0.0042) and increases the DESI-combined tension; (2) A_s COHERENCE is sharper: with M_scal fixed A_s=N^2 c3^7/(24pi^2) is also predicted, A_s(51.44)=1.764e-9 = -11.4 sigma vs Planck 2.105(30)e-9; the A_s-preferred N_star=56.20 exceeds even the instantaneous-reheating bound 55.61 by 0.59 e-folds (instantaneous gives 2.06e-9 = -1.5 sigma, compatible) => within standard physics the measured A_s REQUIRES near-instantaneous reheating and the slow Higgs-channel point is A_s-disfavoured. The [P] point is CONDITIONAL on the decay channel; the frozen band [50,60] remains the prediction surface of record. Kill criteria: robust n_s>=0.967 falsifies the reheating chain (not the [I]/[L] core); A_s already arbitrates between fast and slow reheating

Recorded status: Physical [P] (conditional on M_Star=M_scal + standard reheating)

Dependencies, status detail and source

Canonical status: Physical [P]: N_star=51.4 point inside the frozen band; demotion as compiler output stands

Dependencies: GRAV.SCAL.01 (M_scal); PRED.LAYER.01; REG.FREEZE.01

Scripts: v86_nstar_reheating.py

Location: origin_theory;tfpt_2;introduction

Original CSV, line 160

Original ledger status

FR.DM.03

FR.DM.03

AXION RELIC HONEST MISALIGNMENT ESTIMATE (external-review proposal 2026-06-14; the determinant-line axion can be all DM but stays a [C] scenario): (1) SCALES [I]: f_a = M_scal/(2 dim S+ |mu4|) = M_scal/128 ~ 2.39e11 GeV (M_scal = c3^{7/2} Mbar ~ 3.06e13 GeV), QCD axion m_a ~ 5.7 ueV (1e12/f_a) ~ 23.8 ueV (FR.DM.02). (2) HARMONIC MISALIGNMENT UNDER-PRODUCES [N]: Omega_a h^2 ~ 0.12 (f_a/9e11)^{7/6} <theta^2> gives prefactor ~0.026 per theta^2 at this f_a, so theta_i ~ O(1) makes only ~21% of Omega_DM; reaching Omega_DM h^2 = 0.12 needs theta_eff^2 ~ 4.7, i.e. the large-angle (anharmonic) enhancement. (3) HILLTOP REQUIRED -> SCENARIO [C]: TFPT's misalignment angle theta_i ~ 170 deg (the seam value pi(1-phi_seam)) IS the hilltop where the anharmonic factor diverges, so Omega_a h^2 CAN be tuned to Omega_DM -- but near the hilltop the relic is exponentially sensitive to theta_i and QCD/string corrections, so it is a viable SCENARIO, not a sharp prediction. (4) CONTRACT [O]: F_relic(f_a=M_scal/128, theta_i~170 deg, N_DW=1) =? Omega_DM is a kill test for the determinant-line axion BRANCH, not the theory; the E8 scan leaves no free singlet WIMP (128=(16,4)+(16,4) matter spinor), so the axion is the natural DM line, abundance is transfer/cosmology, never a compiler output. Python-only (analytic estimate; the full finite-T chi(T) ODE is standard cosmology, flagged). POST-INFLATIONARY REFRAMING [C] (2026-07-10, FR.DM.02): the 170 deg hilltop is a PRE-INFLATIONARY fixed-angle reading; given H_inf/f_a~66>1 (R^2 branch) it carries CDM isocurvature >> Planck beta_iso<0.038, so it is SUPERSEDED by the post-inflationary scenario (theta_i a horizon average, NOT observable; relic from f_a + N_DW=|C|=1, v470/v472). Over-production at 170 deg is moot post-inflationary.

Recorded status: Physical [C] (hilltop scenario SUPERSEDED by post-inflationary reframing FR.DM.02; angle not observable)

Dependencies, status detail and source

Canonical status: Physical [C]: f_a=M_scal/128 axion can be all DM only near the theta_i~170 hilltop (exponentially sensitive) -> scenario, branch kill test not theory

Dependencies: FR.DM.01; FR.DM.02; v25_frontier_conjectures.py

Scripts: v185_axion_relic_solver.py

Location: tfpt_4_frontier

Original CSV, line 180

Original ledger status

SYNTH.INVENTORY.01

SYNTH.INVENTORY.01

THE RESIDUAL INVENTORY (one constant, one anchor, one clock to find; the COMPLETE machine-pinned gap list): (A) ONE-CONSTANT INVENTORY [I] - 2/3 = |Z2|/N_fam appears exactly in seven independent places across both sectors (flavor: Koide branch point, transfer-gap base (2/3)^6, attractor inside the physical basin; gravity: Nariai entropy bound, SdS branch separation, canonical amplitude+frequency, canonical curvature base (2/3)^N_fam); ANCHOR TRIPTYCH [I]: configuration chi_a = (t-1)^2(t-2), Nariai cubic (t-1)^2(t+2) = traceless anchor, clock quadratic (lam-1)(lam+2); Nariai = (t-1) x clock; a = e2+e3. (B) RELOCATION THEOREM [I]+[P]: the cosmological one-loop clock correction eps = (c/24pi) Lambda/Mbar^2 = 7.6e-122 (c = 8 = the seam central charge, frozen rho_L) is deficient by 121.5 orders against the needed O(1) gap, and the deficit IS the Lambda hierarchy 2 alpha^-1/ln10 = 119.0 (+2.5 prefactors, the v60 split) => the seam clock must live at the SEAM scale, where the only gapped generator is the established boundary transfer operator; the bridge reaches its final form: ONE [P] identification 'transfer operator = seam Nariai clock'. (C) RESIDUAL TABLE (typing contract): exactly FIVE structural objects remain - R1 seam quantum clock [P] (HOR.CLOCK.01), R2 seam net holomorphic + c=8 [P]/[A] (GATE.METRIC.05/06/07), R3 seam determinant => EH form [A] (SEAM.AREACOEFF.03 residual), R4 H2 dictionary [A]/[P] (GATE.RU.01/CONTRACT.U.01), R5 parabolic realisation of Q carrying P1 [P] (GATE.QGEO.01/FLAV.SHEET.03) - plus the two irreducibles (one scale v_geo by dimensional analysis v78; the primitive pi) and the frozen data surfaces (gamma_CP, n_s/A_s, theta13, m_tau, r). COMPLETENESS is itself the claim: a sixth structural gap would FAIL v105. Nothing closed here; everything that remains is named, typed and counted

Recorded status: Identity [I] (inventory + relocation arithmetic) + typing contract (gap completeness)

Dependencies, status detail and source

Canonical status: Residual inventory: 5 named structural objects + 1 scale + pi; completeness machine-pinned

Dependencies: HOR.CLOCK.01; HOR.TRISECT.01; HOR.NARIAI.01; HOR.ORIENT.01; FR.KOIDE.04/05/06; GATE.METRIC.05-07; GATE.RU.01; GATE.QGEO.01; ANCHOR.VGEO.01; REG.FREEZE.01

Scripts: v105_residual_inventory.py

Location: origin_theory;introduction

Original CSV, line 188

Original ledger status

HOR.CLOCK.02

HOR.CLOCK.02

QUANTUM-CLOCK TARGET (R1 made quantitative; nothing fitted): the Ginsparg-Perry multi-mode clock has per-l equations lambda^2+lambda+(l(l+1)-2)=0 - l=0 anchor pair {1,-2}, l=1 zero modes {0,-1}, l>=2 complex with Re=-1/2=-delta (audit). NEW CROSS-LINK [I]: the classical decay set (l=0,1) = {0,-1,-2} = -Spec(V) = -N_fam x cusp weights - the classical seam clock decays exactly on the grading that carries the transfer operator's eigenspaces (FLAV.QGEO.01/FLAV.DIAMOND.02): structural support for the relocation identification (SYNTH.INVENTORY.01 R1). THE QUANTUM TARGET [I]: transfer rates {0, Delta, 6ln3} are not weight-linear; rate(2)/rate(1) = log_{3/2}(3) = 1+log_{3/2}(2) = 2.7095; exact identity (1/3)^6 = ((2/3)^6)^{log_{3/2}3}; required bend log_{9/4}(3) = 1.35476 per weight step. COUPLING LANDSCAPE [I]: kappa = (c/24pi)(Lambda/Mbar^2), c=8: cosmological 7.6e-122 vs seam 1/(3pi) = 0.106 - the only viable regime, borderline non-perturbative; one-loop linear response cannot fix the bend (O(1) resummation or exact seam construction required). STATUS [P]: R1 = 'produce the bend log_{3/2}3 on the cusp ladder at coupling O(1/3pi)'; identification NOT closed

Recorded status: Identity [I] (tower, cross-link, target arithmetic, coupling) + Physical [P] (identification)

Dependencies, status detail and source

Canonical status: Identity: clock lives on the cusp ladder; exact bend target; [P] identification open

Dependencies: HOR.CLOCK.01; SYNTH.INVENTORY.01 (R1); FLAV.QGEO.01; FLAV.DIAMOND.02 (Spec V); FR.KOIDE.04

Scripts: v107_quantum_clock_target.py

Location: tfpt_horizon_readouts

Original CSV, line 190

Original ledger status

GRAV.H0.01

GRAV.H0.01

COSMOLOGICAL-CONSTANT BRANCH H0 = 66.5..67.1 (2026-06-15, archive integration of the tfpt-31 CC note; sharpens the qualitative H0-vs-Lambda row): the seam number delta_Sigma = m_1 e^{-2 pi alpha^-1/3} with the lowest-block m_1=Omega_adm=48. (1) [N] delta_Sigma^lead = 48 e^{-2 pi*137.036/3} ~ 1.085e-123. (2) [E] convention split M_Pl^4/Mbar^4 = (8 pi)^2 = 631.65 (unreduced vs reduced Planck density -- must be displayed). (3) [N] rho_Lambda = M_Pl^4 delta_Sigma ~ 2.4e-47 GeV^4 (observed vacuum order). (4) [N] 123-orders cross-link |log10 delta_Sigma| ~ 122.96, consistent with the v60 split 122.948. (5) [C] under the flatness closure H0^lead=66.51, H0^disc=67.10 km/s/Mpc -- 1.6..0.5 sigma BELOW Planck (67.36+-0.54), ~6 sigma below SH0ES (73.0+-1.0): HONEST, the Hubble tension is NOT relieved by raising the vacuum scale; H0 uses imported Omega_b, omega_DM (external cosmology), so it is a [C] readout, not a from-nothing output. Python-only (the (8pi)^2 ratio is on the Wolfram path via v60)

Recorded status: Numerical [N] (delta_Sigma, 123-orders) + physical bridge [C] (H0 flatness readout)

Dependencies, status detail and source

Canonical status: Numerical/bridge [N]/[C]: delta_Sigma=48 e^{-2pi alpha^-1/3}~1.085e-123, (8pi)^2 convention split, |log10|~122.96 (v60 consistent); H0=66.5..67.1 below Planck, does NOT relieve the Hubble tension; [C] readout (imported Omega_b, omega_DM)

Dependencies: v60_lambda_metrology_branch.py; v55_coxeter_cycle.py

Scripts: v206_h0_lambda_branch.py

Location: tfpt_4_frontier

Original CSV, line 291

Original ledger status

DM.AXION.SPINE.01

DM.AXION.SPINE.01

AXION DM SPINE-ANGLE BRANCH theta_i = pi N_fam/g_car = 3 pi/5 = 108 deg (2026-06-15): an ALTERNATIVE, more ROBUST misalignment angle than the determinant-line hilltop theta_i ~ 170 deg (FR.DM.03/v185, which over-produces Omega_a h^2 ~ 0.66 ~ 5.5x). (1) [I] RATIONAL MOTIVE: theta_i = pi N_fam/g_car = 3 pi/5 = 108 deg EXACTLY (the central spine quotient 3/5 = N_fam/g_car, a rational multiple of pi, NOT tuned to the relic). (2) [N] ON TARGET: the v185 converged finite-T solver (normalised theta=1 -> Omega_a h^2 ~ 0.03) reaches Omega_DM h^2 = 0.12 at theta ~ 106 deg; the spine angle 108 deg sits essentially there (~2 deg away), harmonic estimate 0.03 theta^2 = 0.107 confirms the order, a mild anharmonic factor lifts to ~0.12. (3) [C] ROBUST (the genuine advantage over v185): 108 deg lies 62 deg BELOW the 170 deg hilltop, in the MILD-anharmonic regime, so the relic is NOT exponentially sensitive -- a far more robust landing on Omega_DM; IF theta_i is the spine quotient, the determinant-line axion is ALL of dark matter without hilltop tuning. (4) [O] HONEST -- AN ALTERNATIVE ANSATZ: theta_i = 3 pi/5 (spine motive) and theta_i = pi(1-phi_seam) ~ 170 deg (seam-value motive, v185) are MUTUALLY EXCLUSIVE readings of the same angle; neither is forced -- the full finite-T solver decides. A sharper SCENARIO, not a derivation; abundance is cosmology, never a compiler output. (5) [X] KILL TEST: a full finite-T solve at theta_i = 3 pi/5, f_a = M_scal/128, N_DW = 1 -- Omega_a h^2 outside ~[0.08,0.16] demotes the spine branch (compiler core untouched; the no-WIMP E8 scan is independent). Python-only. POST-INFLATIONARY REFRAMING [C] (2026-07-10, FR.DM.02): given H_inf/f_a~66>1 (R^2 branch) a FIXED pre-inflationary spine angle carries CDM isocurvature >> Planck beta_iso<0.038; in the natural POST-INFLATIONARY scenario theta_i is a HORIZON AVERAGE, NOT observable -- so 108 deg = 3 pi/5 is retained as a STRUCTURAL RATIONAL (3/5=N_fam/g_car), NOT a relic prediction; the relic follows from f_a + N_DW=|C|=1 (v470/v472). The [X] angle kill test is SUPERSEDED by the post-inflationary reading (angle not measurable).

Recorded status: Physical [C] (spine angle = structural rational / NOT observable post-inflationary; relic from f_a + N_DW=1; reframed by FR.DM.02)

Dependencies, status detail and source

Canonical status: Physical [C]: theta_i = pi N_fam/g_car = 3 pi/5 = 108 deg (spine quotient) lands on Omega_DM ~106 deg ROBUSTLY (mild-anharmonic, far below the 170 deg hilltop) -- a more robust DM branch than v185; an alternative ansatz, the full solver decides; kill test outside ~[0.08,0.16] demotes the branch

Dependencies: FR.DM.01; FR.DM.02; FR.DM.03; v185_axion_relic_solver.py

Scripts: v211_axion_spine_angle.py

Location: tfpt_4_frontier

Original CSV, line 299

Original ledger status

DM.AXION.PENTAGON.01

DM.AXION.PENTAGON.01

THE 'UNMAPPED' ICOSAHEDRAL/GOLDEN E8 STRUCTURE SURFACES IN THE ONE EXTERNAL COSMOLOGICAL INPUT theta_i (2026-06-26, v429): a geometric re-reading answering the parsimony question 'why does so much idle E8 structure exist?' for the one case where the idle structure has a job. [E] THETA_I = g_car-GON INTERIOR ANGLE: because N_fam = g_car-2, the spine quotient theta_i = pi N_fam/g_car = (g_car-2)pi/g_car is EXACTLY the interior angle of the regular g_car-gon; for g_car=5 the PENTAGON, theta_i = 3 pi/5 = 108 deg (the carrier polygon, not a bare rational multiple of pi). [E] COS IS GOLDEN: cos(3 pi/5) = (1-sqrt5)/4 = -1/(2 phi), partner 2 cos(2 pi/5) = 1/phi = phi-1, phi = 2 cos(pi/5) = (1+sqrt5)/2 -- the golden ratio v354 called 'unmapped' (and v313/GOLD.ATOMS.01 named the g_car=5 signature) IS theta_i's angular data. [E] GOLDEN CHARACTER UNIQUE TO g_car=5: among small regular n-gons only n=5 has an irrational interior-angle cosine (n=3,4,6 give 1/2,0,-1/2, all rational); so theta_i is golden BECAUSE the carrier is 5 (P2). [C] BRIDGE (NO STATUS CHANGE): connects E8.REVERSE.AUDIT.01/GOLD.ATOMS.01 (phi = the unmapped g_car=5 signature) to DM.AXION.SPINE.01/v211 (theta_i = 3 pi/5 the one external input); REFINES v354 from 'phi in NO physical readout' to 'phi touches ONLY the [C] spine misalignment angle' (conditional, branch-level, never a frozen prediction); a geometric MOTIVE for the spine over the hilltop theta_i ~ 170 deg (whose cosine is not a clean pentagon value), consistent with -- not replacing -- the finite-T solver that decides the branch (v185/v211). Does NOT derive theta_i, does NOT upgrade DM.AXION.SPINE.01 (stays [C]), closes no gate. Wolfram-mirrored, Python (sympy)

Recorded status: Identity [E] (theta_i = regular g_car-gon interior angle; cos = -1/(2 phi); golden character unique to g_car=5) + [C] bridge re-reading (no status change)

Dependencies, status detail and source

Canonical status: Identity [E]: theta_i = 3 pi/5 is the regular g_car-gon (pentagon) interior angle, cos theta_i = -1/(2 phi), and the golden character is unique to g_car=5 -- so the 'unmapped' golden/icosahedral E8 structure (v354/v313) is the geometry of the one external cosmological input theta_i (v211); [C] a re-reading that refines v354 and gives a geometric motive for the spine branch, but does NOT upgrade DM.AXION.SPINE.01 (stays [C]) or close any gate

Dependencies: DM.AXION.SPINE.01; E8.REVERSE.AUDIT.01; GOLD.ATOMS.01

Scripts: v429_axion_pentagon_phi.py

Location: tfpt_4_frontier

Original CSV, line 300

Original ledger status

PS.SPECACT.01

PS.SPECACT.01

SPECTRAL-ACTION HEAT-KERNEL EXPANSION (a0,a2,a4) + EXPLICIT kappa(f2/f0) (2026-06-17): closes the open obligation v252 #11 (spectral-action expansion) and makes the kappa-dependence on the cutoff moments explicit (v253 #5). The bosonic spectral action S = Tr f(D/Lambda) has the Seeley-DeWitt expansion S ~ 2 f4 Lambda^4 a0 + 2 f2 Lambda^2 a2 + f0 a4 (f4,f2 moments, f0=f(0)). (1) [E] expansion structure: a0=cosmological (N int sqrt g), a2=Einstein-Hilbert + Higgs mass, a4=Yang-Mills + Weyl^2 + R^2 + Higgs quartic + R|H|^2, with N=dim H_F=96 (Gilkey/Chamseddine-Connes). (2) [E] trace inputs a=Tr(Y+Y)=2.96, b=Tr((Y+Y)^2)=2.92, b/a^2=0.333=1/3 (top-Yukawa dominated, the Chamseddine-Connes value). (3) [E] gauge normalisation: the a4 Yang-Mills term fixes g3=g2=sqrt(5/3)g1, sin^2 thetaW=(sum T3^2)/(sum Q^2)=3/8 (cross-check v245). (4) [C] Higgs quartic: lambda(Lambda) ~ g^2 b/a^2 = g^2/3; with the sigma ingredient present (v254) this is the famous ~125 GeV (vs ~170 GeV without sigma) Higgs-mass prediction after RG running (m_H vs 125.25 GeV); exact coefficient + running cited. (5) [E] scalaron from R^2: the gravitational a4 carries a Weyl^2 + R^2 term with coefficient ~ f0 N; the R^2 spin-0 mode IS the Starobinsky scalaron, M_s its mass (R+R^2 gravity emerges from the spectral action). (6) [C] kappa made explicit: a2 carries f2 (Einstein-Hilbert), a4 carries f0 (R^2/scalaron + gauge), so kappa=M_PS/M_s=sqrt((f2/f0) c_PS/c_grav) is an explicit ratio of the two moments x traces over H_F; the RG value kappa~1.3 (v253) fixes f2/f0 to O(1). (7) [O] the exact kappa decimal and exact lambda(Lambda) need the cutoff function f fixed -- the last genuinely open input.

Recorded status: Numerical (spectral action) [E]/[C]/[O]

Dependencies, status detail and source

Canonical status: [E] Seeley-DeWitt expansion structure + trace inputs (b/a^2=1/3) + sin^2 thetaW=3/8 + scalaron from R^2; [C] Higgs quartic ~125 GeV + explicit kappa(f2/f0); [O] cutoff moments; closes v252 spectral-action obligation

Dependencies: PS.DIRAC.02; PS.KAPPA.01; CONTRACT.QFT4D.01

Scripts: v255_spectral_action_expansion.py

Location: tfpt_research_contracts

Original CSV, line 341

Original ledger status

FLAV.NUSCALE.01

FLAV.NUSCALE.01

ABSOLUTE NEUTRINO-MASS SCALE TYPED HONESTLY (2026-06-18): does NOT fabricate a Sigma m_nu number (would contradict the v184 firewall); closes the PMNS bookkeeping instead. [E] the absolute scale reduces to ONE seesaw ratio m_3 = (y_nu v_EW)^2/M_R -- one irreducible UV input like v_geo (No-Unit, v153); the ratios (m2/m3, ordering, PMNS angles v270) are pinned. [N] the observed m_3 = sqrt(dm2_atm) = 0.050 eV with the TFPT PS->GUT scale window M_R in [M_PS=4.2e13, M_GUT=2.4e15] GeV (v249) needs a third-generation Dirac Yukawa y_nu in [0.26, 2.0] -- O(1), Yukawa-natural, no tuning. [O] the y_nu=1 seesaw scale M_R=v_EW^2/m_3=6.1e14 GeV has log_c3(M_R/Mbar)=2.57 (non-integer), not a TFPT compiler output; (y_nu,M_R) trade off so the absolute Sigma m_nu stays one open UV input. [C] the normal-ordering floor Sigma m_nu = m_2+m_3 = 0.0586 eV is consistent with Planck+BAO (<0.12 eV) and DESI 2024 (~0.072 eV). [X] a cosmological Sigma < 0.0586 eV excludes the NO m1~0 spectrum. UPDATE 2026-07-14 (v481/FLAV.NUSCALE.02): under the CARRIER normalisation y_nu = y_t (minimal 16.16.10 Yukawa sector, [P]) the (y_nu, M_R) trade-off collapses to M_R alone; the required M_R = 9.3e13 GeV sits INSIDE the PS window at log_c3(Mbar/M_R) = 3.15; the integer rung c3^3 Mbar is DECLINED at 1-loop (m_3 40% low). The absolute scale stays [O]; candidate class, frozen record untouched.

Recorded status: Bookkeeping [E] + window [N]/[C] + [O] absolute scale + [X] kill

Dependencies, status detail and source

Canonical status: [E] the absolute nu-scale = one seesaw ratio (parallels v_geo); [N]/[C] the TFPT PS->GUT window is consistent with the observed spectrum at O(1) Dirac Yukawa + the cosmological floor; [O] the absolute value stays one open UV input (M_R not a clean Mbar power, v184); [X] the NO floor is the kill test. Closes the PMNS bookkeeping, not the absolute number.

Dependencies: FLAV.PMNS.02; FLAV.PMNS.03; PS.RGTEST.01; FR.MPME.02; ANCHOR.VGEO.02

Scripts: v272_nu_mass_scale.py

Location: tfpt_2_standard_model

Original CSV, line 365

Original ledger status

SCALE.OVERDET.01

SCALE.OVERDET.01

THE SINGLE MASS ANCHOR IS OVER-DETERMINED; NO DERIVABLE ABSOLUTE SCALE IS A THEOREM (2026-06-18): sharpens the No-Unit theorem (v153). [E] one anchor: every dimensionful output is a pure number x M_bar^d (rho_Lambda/M_bar^4 = (3/4 pi^2) e^{-2 alpha^-1} = 7.13e-121 v60/v7, M_scal/M_bar = c3^{7/2} v7, the whole mass spectrum); the absolute neutrino scale (v272) and v_geo are the SAME anchor. [N] OVER-DETERMINATION: two independent routes to M_bar agree -- Route 1 (gravity) M_bar = (8 pi G)^{-1/2} = 2.4353e18 GeV; Route 2 (cosmology) invert the compiler prediction rho_Lambda/M_bar^4 with the measured rho_Lambda^{1/4} = 2.24 meV -> M_bar = 2.438e18 GeV, agreeing to 0.11%. [E] the anchor is the gravitational unit (G), the one measured dimensionful input of all physics (modern SI fixes hbar, c exactly). [E] THEOREM not gap: the seam is a conformal c=8 chiral CFT (v157/v158), scale-invariant by construction so provably no intrinsic scale; the scale is gravitational, entering only through the ambient measure (QG.AMB.01). [A] TFPT is scale-complete up to one over-determined anchor (the Planck mass) -- maximal predictivity for a dimensionless compiler, not a missing derivation.

Recorded status: Identity [E] + over-determination [N] + re-typing [A]

Dependencies, status detail and source

Canonical status: [E] one anchor + the conformal-seam reason; [N] the two-route over-determination (gravity vs dark energy, 0.11%); [A] the re-typing of v_geo to an over-determined anchor = the Planck mass. Sharpens v153/v78.

Dependencies: ANCHOR.VGEO.02; COSMO.LAM.01; QG.AMB.01; FLAV.NUSCALE.01

Scripts: v274_scale_overdetermination.py

Location: tfpt_4_frontier

Original CSV, line 367

Original ledger status

REDTEAM.F.01

REDTEAM.F.01

RED TEAM Target F -- adversarial audit of the perturbative 4D-QFT + scale round (v269-v275), published in release 5.2. TWO attacks land and force a narrowing (now folded into v269/v274); the rest survive as typed. (1) GRAVITY S_pert NON-UNITARY: power-counting renormalizability is not unitarity -- the spectral-action R^2/Weyl^2 sector gives a 4-derivative propagator 1/(p^2(p^2+M^2)) whose massive spin-2 mode has a NEGATIVE residue (the Stelle ghost), so S_pert is unitary for the matter+gauge sector only; the gravity perturbative S-matrix carries the ghost, which is exactly why the nonperturbative QG.AMB.01 (asymptotic safety v207 / boundary (E8)_1 net) is the real frontier, not a new gap. (2) OVER-DETERMINATION CONDITIONAL: v274 Route-2 inverts rho_Lambda/M_bar^4=(3/4pi^2)e^{-2 alpha^-1} = LAMBDA.BRANCH.01 [C], so the 0.11% gravity-vs-cosmology agreement is conditional on the Lambda-branch (the gravity route is unconditional). Already-honest: J_PMNS (v270) inherits delta's [C] provenance (assembled mu6/triality phase, not an M_nu output); the nu-scale (v272) is [O] with the NO floor Sigma m_nu=0.0586 eV as the one kill test. FIREWALL HOLDS: no positive-claim doc carries an unscoped overclaim (the red-team paper itself is excluded as it quotes forbidden phrases to forbid them). Verdict: SURVIVES (narrowed).

Recorded status: Red-team [P] (survives, narrowed)

Dependencies, status detail and source

Canonical status: Red-team verdict: the v269-v275 round survives as typed; two narrowings folded into v269 (gravity-sector Stelle ghost -> S_pert unitary for matter+gauge only) and v274 (over-determination conditional on the Lambda-branch). The perturbative gravity ghost IS the QG.AMB.01 frontier.

Dependencies: QFT4D.SPERT.01; QFT4D.SPERT.02; QFT4D.SPERT.03; FLAV.PMNS.03; FLAV.NUSCALE.01; SCALE.OVERDET.01; QGAMB.ROADMAP.01

Scripts: redteam/rt_F_qft4d.py

Location: tfpt_5_redteam

Original CSV, line 369

Original ledger status

FR.DYNAMICS.01

FR.DYNAMICS.01

THE DISCRETE->DYNAMIC LENS ON F_transfer (2026-06-19): asks whether the main-branch mechanism -- a gapped, positivity-preserving relaxation to a UNIQUE attractor (the local-averaging update m<-(A+2I)/4 m -> the E8 marks, gap 6 log(3/2)) -- is also the shape of the four F_transfer instances, or an unrelated bolt-on. Answer: ALL FOUR share the SAME shape (a gapped contraction/flow to a unique attractor: Perron-Frobenius / Boltzmann H-theorem / RG fixed point), but only ONE has the SEAM rate. [E] F_pole (Koide) IS the seam dynamics: the source->pole/branch relaxation is the Moebius map with fixed-point multiplier F'=(2/3)^6 = lambda_2 = the seam-clock subleading eigenvalue (v82/v54); |F'|<1 => a unique attractor at the SEAM rate (gap 6 log(3/2)), two starts converge at rate lambda_2^n. [C] F_Boltzmann (eta_B): the baryon asymmetry is the slow mode of a positivity-preserving Boltzmann operator; washout kappa_f in (0,1) converges to the unique balance (homog. part decays, gap=W>0); compiler fixes A_Lambda=10 (in M_1 and m~_1); the RATE is thermal, NOT the seam gap. [C] F_relic (axion): the misalignment field's comoving number density relaxes to a CONSTANT once H<~m_a (adiabatic invariant, a fixed point); seed theta_i=3pi/5=(N_fam/g_car)pi; the RATE is cosmological. [I] F_QCD (m_p/m_e): the 1-loop RG flow with the carrier coefficient b3=-7 (b0=11-2 nf/3=7, nf=2 N_fam; asymptotic freedom) has the Gaussian UV fixed point as attractor (alpha_s->0 toward the UV), Lambda_QCD the dynamically generated IR scale; b3 from the carrier, the flow standard RG. [O] VERDICT: one shape (gapped relaxation/flow to a unique attractor) underlies all four = the main-branch discrete->dynamic principle; F_pole has the seam rate exactly ((2/3)^6), the other three share only the shape (external rates: thermal/cosmological/RG). So F_transfer is the downstream readout end of the one principle, NOT a bolt-on; the theory's simplicity is preserved precisely because the external rates are honestly fenced (v187), not because they reduce to the seam.

Recorded status: Dynamical-systems unification [E/C] (one shape / one seam-rate)

Dependencies, status detail and source

Canonical status: [E] the F_pole seam-rate identity (Koide multiplier = (2/3)^6 = seam eigenvalue); [C] the Boltzmann/relic relaxations (shared shape, external rate); [I] the QCD RG UV-attractor (carrier coefficient b3=-7); [O] the unifying verdict. Demonstrates the SHARED discrete->dynamic shape across F_transfer; does NOT reduce the three external rates to the seam, does NOT upgrade any frontier number to [E].

Dependencies: CONTRACT.F.01; FR.KOIDE.04; SEAM.ATTRACTOR.01; SEAM.EQUIV.GAP.01

Scripts: v303_ftransfer_dynamics.py

Location: tfpt_research_contracts

Original CSV, line 396

Open questions preserve their achieved subresults

Each research problem has its own scope. A resolved task does not close its whole physical parent. Historical tasks remain explicitly historical in the source record.

Future quotient and positive GNS reconstruction

What is determined by complete future behavior, and what additional positive word-kernel source is needed to reconstruct a cyclic operator realization?

  • Resolved in scope: Future quotient from complete rRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Conditional GNS reconstruction from supplied KRead result
  • open: Select complete K from the original source
Historical: common source, state and event selection

Outside the active mathematical research program since the user's23Oct2026 decision. Historical question: Do the original principles derive a common physical source together with its state, dynamical events, and physically observed fields?

Seam connection and family action

Does the joint discrete theorem determine a concrete connection and a family coupling compatible with the determinant seam action?

  • Resolved in scope: Separate classes from actual transportRead result
  • open: Derive the common connection from the original source
Physical time and complete transfer

Do the original reflection/projector structures determine the full physical time generator and required field transfer?

  • Resolved in scope: Reuse the sign-projector counterexampleRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Reuse conditional full-transfer reconstructionRead result
  • open: Identify the physical complete TFPT transfer
  • Resolved in scope: Reuse complete collar reconstructionRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Classify homogeneous GKLS embedding of the shared register familyRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Decide every homogeneous GKSL logarithm of the fixed M4 channelRead result
Flavor ratio and absolute amplitude scale

Which flavor quantity is fixed on the derived discrete stratum, and which requires the continuous holonomy anchor?

  • Resolved in scope: Reuse the derived flavor ratioRead result
  • open: Determine the absolute holonomy amplitude
Alpha: derived terms, unique root and physical EM identification

Where do the factors and closed alpha equation come from, which provenance steps are proved, and which precise physical EM identification remains open?

  • Resolved in scope: Separate root calculation from source selectionRead result
  • open: Derive the actual EM functional variation and Thomson identification
  • Resolved in scope: Establish the unique global positive rootRead result
Geometric flow and gravity normalization

Do common matter-only observations derive geometric horizon flow and the area response from the original gravity source?

  • Resolved in scope: Record scope of fixed original functionalRead result
  • open: Derive geometric modular response and area coefficient
Clocks and complete neutral source response

Which complete quadratic response can the actual clock images reconstruct?

  • Resolved in scope: Reconstruct all neutral quadratic matrix directionsRead result
  • open: Derive physically admissible probe access
Clock action on charge, time and quarter transition

How does the actual Gaussian J act on the complete marked source?

  • Resolved in scope: Construct original J lift with complete time/charge actionRead result
  • open: Derive physical meaning of the frame orbit
Which responses distinguish charged time action?

Which data separate sources with identical complete neutral vacuum response?

  • Resolved in scope: Determine twist blindness completelyRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Reconstruct twist from charged responsesRead result
  • open: Derive actual charged source probes
Which seam action distinguishes native opposite charges?

Can existing native charge fields produce the quarter-twist time response of the seam?

  • Resolved in scope: Check native fields and response discriminatorRead result
  • open: Derive actual marked seam/state action
Constructive seam search: operators, state and source compatibility

What does the complete phase search decide, and which additional state information prevents a false source solution?

  • Resolved in scope: Finite search closed, actual winding and parity equivalenceRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Positive finite-word state extensionRead result
  • Resolved in scope: E8 current group conditionally determines the P signRead result
  • Resolved in scope: The same shift functional hides distinct ground statesRead result
  • Resolved in scope: No phase hit realizes the unchanged sourceRead result
Which partner actually belongs to the original seam?

Which charge, state type and time action belong to the root partner and original sheet pairing?

  • Resolved in scope: Concrete pair operator; source neutrality is not hypercharge neutralityRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Fixed quarter time splits the color/weak multipletRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Explicit conjugation for the existing sheet pairingRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Actual partner map between quarter domainsRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Bilinear sheet pairing is not Hermitian kernel selectionRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Actual quarter conjugation transports the supplied markingRead result
  • Resolved in scope: No time-stabilizing orthogonal repair of the fixed markingRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Spinor16 is a state sector, not a 16-real one-particle fieldRead result
Automated construction of operator maps and sources

Which tools generate operator maps, learn counterexamples, and can search for the full positive source?

  • Resolved in scope: Calibrate new search without supplying the target mapRead result
  • open: Synthesize a joint field, marking and transfer dictionary
  • open: Search for the positive common source kernel itself
  • Resolved in scope: Automatically construct, certify and distinguish finite kernelsRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Repair search conditions against source types and collar controlsRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Reconstruct multi-field sewing of the canonically identified boundary sourceRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Retain absolute reference amplitude in searchRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Integrate supplied free source including boundary response and scalarRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Convert the full finite CAR kernel into a link functionalRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Close original recursive word reconstruction with memoryRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Retain whole original caller through scale and readoutRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Execute actual shared Higgs source with full matter words and local RPRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Reduce whole constant original Higgs spectral fiberRead result
  • open: Resolve original geometric Higgs residue sign and field map
  • Resolved in scope: Evaluate local original Higgs heat identification and whole finite consumerRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Execute whole variable bound Higgs reference and original scale mapRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Execute whole inner Higgs scale/source and normal kernel transportRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Execute given whole superconnection and normal spectral readerRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Determine own-admissibility and whole total-chiral spectral readersRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Derive whole scale-energy map,normal profile and relative flowRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Execute original Green energy producer and mixed scale readoutRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Match current action argument and common Higgs/gravity weightsRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Execute whole original curvature consumers and Higgs radial sourceRead resultRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Execute original whole four-ghost source and geometric type testRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Execute original moving normal kernel derivative and whole source responseRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Decide fixed original O1 source and normal operator placementRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Compare whole Higgs mixture and covariance reader on invariant four-field witnessRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Test exact bounded cutoff on whole ordinary Higgs volumeRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Test whole original circle joint mode and IR Higgs normalizationRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Test original O1 mode covariance against whole Higgs-law classRead result
  • open: Reconstruct original localization from the whole process
  • Resolved in scope: Test bare native-code word compression against actual localityRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Decide original geometric local-time class and execute actual interval readerRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Execute actual regional two-face partner and supported charged wordRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Execute original color marginal, modular field law and complete class readerRead resultRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Reconstruct common Higgs law from whole original quarter source towerRead resultRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Execute original record action on Doily and ordered whole source responseRead resultRead resultRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Locally implement original record process and test unchanged exterior sourceRead resultRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Execute original elliptic insertion,whole source and causal responseRead resultRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Evaluate actual joint Higgs and color group sourceRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Execute whole original graph color reader with typed original center selectorRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Execute original color fixed source and first inherited grading testRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Execute actual original color-spinor CAR four-word and complete spin-sector sewingRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Decide actual color admissibility of density operations and coordinate regionsRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Execute actual whole seam-operation class and two-face responseRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Execute entire original C6 word expansion with source amplitudeRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Execute original collective Higgs force source and entire mean dualRead resultRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Execute original all-mode force with actual time and whole sourceRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Execute original local space/time force source and causal liftRead resultRead result
Origin reverse selection, field dictionary and original P1 kernel

What does reverse selection of P1/P2 give for concrete local fields and multi-field responses, and which identification with the original P1 kernel has actually been proved?

Observable reality: minimal conditions and counterworlds

Which operational conditions are independently required, which inequivalent models satisfy them, and which observable distinctions remain for selection?

Formal carrier core: unbounded Pascal uniqueness and finite glue

Which carrier and glue statements are already present in the papers and Lean sources, and which physical selection does not follow?

  • Resolved in scope: Classify the unbounded Pascal proofRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Classify the formal finite glue scopeRead result
Active mathematical program: marked seam monodromies and lattice lifts

Which marked seam/lattice transport geometries, lift classes and local-coefficient invariants arise from existing clock/reflection/quartic data? First complete case: sign lifts of fourJ representation on CP1 minusμ4.

  • Resolved in scope: Define marked seam category and factor formulaRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Completely classify quarter-clock four-puncture liftsRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Determine central class and all subgroup restrictionsRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Determine full G0 cocycle and classRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Determine native4/5/6local cohomologyRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Classify unrestricted G31 reflection monodromiesRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Determine lift class beyond G0Read result
  • open: Classify additional reflection/clock equivariance and mapping-class quotients
  • Resolved in scope: Equivariant lifting and divisibility by eightRead result
  • Resolved in scope: All62clock obstructions and central transport variantsRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Actual group comparison and central pushout exclusionRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Complete invariants and explicit collisionsRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Compare E6 and E7 slices with the actual quarter clockRead resultRead resultRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Classify original character-valued G31monodromy liftsRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Determine E7-pair action on all original lattice fieldsRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Completely connect E6/E7 cuts to the original compilerRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Compare common covers and actual clock carriersRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Prove shared representation consequence for48,4/3 and5/4Read result
  • Resolved in scope: Completely decide joint compiler-field-cover constructionRead resultRead resultRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Reconstruct canonical local compiler field source from C4Read resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Eliminate redundant sector and multiplicity assumptionsRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Classify native equivariant markingsRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Classify pure quarter clock mapping class quotientRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Determine complete cut algebra and lossless tetrahedron transformRead resultRead resultRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Completely compare scalar glue and actual native compiler classRead resultRead resultRead resultRead result
Common clock sectors, quartic geometry and operational reconstruction

Which previously separate data of the original TFPT core follow from a common clock and representation geometry, and which complete finite measurement classification follows without asserting physical source selection?

Automatic response search with original-source decision

Which additional joint response actually follows from original source equations, and which entire finite process family remains undecided without it?