What does this inventory cover?
Every one of the 783 active ledger IDs is included. All 788 ledger rows, including superseded rows, remain in the download. The reviewed research corpus contains 899 findings; 1 administrative record is excluded from public scientific content, with the omission recorded in the coverage file.
The scientific findings include 687 established scoped results, 70 conditional results and 141 scoped exclusions. These labels describe the recorded finding. They do not upgrade its parent physical goal or overwrite the original ledger.
Sources were matched to their recorded hashes and line ranges at this snapshot. Bounded text excerpts make sources available even when a source is not in the earlier public release. Any omitted administrative lines are explicitly marked. This is source coverage, not a new execution of Python, Lean or Wolfram proofs.
Atlas revision e8ff15ada9a63996de0abff5 · snapshot SHA256 ae313bc3f7102feb6fdc26c61a20ec8157ecb54f991b991d4f769ca56ccb350f
Established within the stated premises
finding:alpha-exact-coefficients-and-root-retain-specific-physical-ward-obligation
Coefficient identities and the unique alpha root are retained. The old circle canonically supplies Pi and det_F(1-qPi)=1-q; for trace-class C-P the same relative factor survives exactly in every faithful KMS polarization class on that same circle. Actual full positive projection covariance fixes the whole CAR state without an extra Gaussian premise. The finite Quillen chain is beyond its older open summary: v985 resolves the finite mu4 channel swap; v995 closes finite KMS rigidity and state extension; v1014 checks the finite determinant-line restriction isomorphism and records reference A0. Do not reopen those steps. What remains is the original local EM source/operator map and relative real renormalized determinant norm producing the seam factor with response exponent5/4, coupling q(alpha), local variation terms and normalization in the same channel. Abstract continuum/Bismut-Freed identification and matching to the physical Thomson coupling do not follow from finite calculations. Chiral phase cancellation does not refute real EM susceptibility. EM.WARD.01 and ALPHA.QUILLEN.EXACT.01 retain their existing physical residual.
Scope: Source-reviewed status/type correction, not a new general nonderivability theorem or gate. P1/P2 remain accepted starting principles; being axioms is not an objection. The line is derived on the old circle, not an arbitrary vector to select again. v382 replay26October:6/6; literalTrue status checks do not prove open functional origin. Ledger Numerical and full physical status remain unchanged.
Required premises and original source excerpts
- Specified EM function with positive seam response
F(x)=x³−2c³x²+(4/5)c⁶M log(p+q(1−q)^(−5/4)), c=1/(8π), p=1/(6π), q=48c⁴exp(−2x), M>0; original budget M=41. The function and inputs are premises here.
premise:fixed-em-seam-function - Model results remain conditional
Calculations in a fixed E8 net, quotient, family packet, or readout apply only under their stated inputs and do not select those inputs.
premise:fixed-input-models-scoped - P1/P2 remain declared starting axioms
This program checks which additional source, state, event, and observable structures follow from accepted TFPT principles; it does not revoke or replace P1/P2.
premise:declared-p1-p2 - Same original circle with trace-class changed polarization
For the mathematical continuation retain H,B_a psi_n=(n+a)psi_n,0<a<1,u psi_n=psi_(n+1),P=1_(B_a<0),uPu*=P+Pi. C is a positive contraction with trace-class C-P; actual functional-calculus C_beta=(I+exp(beta B_a))^-1,beta>0 belongs to this class. Physical KMS/OS/EM source identification is not presumed.
premise:same-original-circle-trace-class-covariance - Test a positive joint CAR source against the full geometric projection
Consider an arbitrary normalized positive state on the specified joint charged two-face CAR algebra,without assuming quasifreeness or U1 invariance. The geometric target is the existing closed chiral annulus graph P_A with both marked faces,W=1/2 and original NS B_Sigma. Actual identity C_source=P_A is an explicit condition of the uniqueness theorem and an unresolved P1 source equation,not a fact inferred from geometry or RP. A finite error test applies only on a genuinely P_A reducing CAR block. Complete Dirac vector source,OS Padm and physical time are not identified with this chiral scalar target. No freely chosen purification supplies missing physical cross correlations.
premise:positive-joint-car-source-tested-against-full-geometric-projector - Do not identify source types
Observable algebra, OS reflection, state, collar operator, time evolution, carrier connection, family holonomy, and readout are distinct data until an original map relates them.
premise:typed-source-structures
Open questions preserve their achieved subresults
Each research problem has its own scope. A resolved task does not close its whole physical parent. Historical tasks remain explicitly historical in the source record.
Future quotient and positive GNS reconstruction
What is determined by complete future behavior, and what additional positive word-kernel source is needed to reconstruct a cyclic operator realization?
- Resolved in scope: Future quotient from complete rRead result
- Resolved in scope: Conditional GNS reconstruction from supplied KRead result
- open: Select complete K from the original source
Historical: common source, state and event selection
Outside the active mathematical research program since the user's23Oct2026 decision. Historical question: Do the original principles derive a common physical source together with its state, dynamical events, and physically observed fields?
Seam connection and family action
Does the joint discrete theorem determine a concrete connection and a family coupling compatible with the determinant seam action?
- Resolved in scope: Separate classes from actual transportRead result
- open: Derive the common connection from the original source
Physical time and complete transfer
Do the original reflection/projector structures determine the full physical time generator and required field transfer?
- Resolved in scope: Reuse the sign-projector counterexampleRead result
- Resolved in scope: Reuse conditional full-transfer reconstructionRead result
- open: Identify the physical complete TFPT transfer
- Resolved in scope: Reuse complete collar reconstructionRead result
- Resolved in scope: Classify homogeneous GKLS embedding of the shared register familyRead result
- Resolved in scope: Decide every homogeneous GKSL logarithm of the fixed M4 channelRead result
Flavor ratio and absolute amplitude scale
Which flavor quantity is fixed on the derived discrete stratum, and which requires the continuous holonomy anchor?
- Resolved in scope: Reuse the derived flavor ratioRead result
- open: Determine the absolute holonomy amplitude
Alpha: derived terms, unique root and physical EM identification
Where do the factors and closed alpha equation come from, which provenance steps are proved, and which precise physical EM identification remains open?
- Resolved in scope: Separate root calculation from source selectionRead result
- open: Derive the actual EM functional variation and Thomson identification
- Resolved in scope: Establish the unique global positive rootRead result
Geometric flow and gravity normalization
Do common matter-only observations derive geometric horizon flow and the area response from the original gravity source?
- Resolved in scope: Record scope of fixed original functionalRead result
- open: Derive geometric modular response and area coefficient
Clocks and complete neutral source response
Which complete quadratic response can the actual clock images reconstruct?
- Resolved in scope: Reconstruct all neutral quadratic matrix directionsRead result
- open: Derive physically admissible probe access
Clock action on charge, time and quarter transition
How does the actual Gaussian J act on the complete marked source?
- Resolved in scope: Construct original J lift with complete time/charge actionRead result
- open: Derive physical meaning of the frame orbit
Which responses distinguish charged time action?
Which data separate sources with identical complete neutral vacuum response?
- Resolved in scope: Determine twist blindness completelyRead result
- Resolved in scope: Reconstruct twist from charged responsesRead result
- open: Derive actual charged source probes
Which seam action distinguishes native opposite charges?
Can existing native charge fields produce the quarter-twist time response of the seam?
- Resolved in scope: Check native fields and response discriminatorRead result
- open: Derive actual marked seam/state action
Constructive seam search: operators, state and source compatibility
What does the complete phase search decide, and which additional state information prevents a false source solution?
- Resolved in scope: Finite search closed, actual winding and parity equivalenceRead result
- Resolved in scope: Positive finite-word state extensionRead result
- Resolved in scope: E8 current group conditionally determines the P signRead result
- Resolved in scope: The same shift functional hides distinct ground statesRead result
- Resolved in scope: No phase hit realizes the unchanged sourceRead result
Which partner actually belongs to the original seam?
Which charge, state type and time action belong to the root partner and original sheet pairing?
- Resolved in scope: Concrete pair operator; source neutrality is not hypercharge neutralityRead result
- Resolved in scope: Fixed quarter time splits the color/weak multipletRead result
- Resolved in scope: Explicit conjugation for the existing sheet pairingRead result
- Resolved in scope: Actual partner map between quarter domainsRead result
- Resolved in scope: Bilinear sheet pairing is not Hermitian kernel selectionRead result
- Resolved in scope: Actual quarter conjugation transports the supplied markingRead result
- Resolved in scope: No time-stabilizing orthogonal repair of the fixed markingRead result
- Resolved in scope: Spinor16 is a state sector, not a 16-real one-particle fieldRead result
Automated construction of operator maps and sources
Which tools generate operator maps, learn counterexamples, and can search for the full positive source?
- Resolved in scope: Calibrate new search without supplying the target mapRead result
- open: Synthesize a joint field, marking and transfer dictionary
- open: Search for the positive common source kernel itself
- Resolved in scope: Automatically construct, certify and distinguish finite kernelsRead result
- Resolved in scope: Repair search conditions against source types and collar controlsRead result
- Resolved in scope: Reconstruct multi-field sewing of the canonically identified boundary sourceRead result
- Resolved in scope: Retain absolute reference amplitude in searchRead result
- Resolved in scope: Integrate supplied free source including boundary response and scalarRead result
- Resolved in scope: Convert the full finite CAR kernel into a link functionalRead result
- Resolved in scope: Close original recursive word reconstruction with memoryRead resultRead result
- Resolved in scope: Retain whole original caller through scale and readoutRead resultRead result
- Resolved in scope: Execute actual shared Higgs source with full matter words and local RPRead resultRead result
- Resolved in scope: Reduce whole constant original Higgs spectral fiberRead result
- open: Resolve original geometric Higgs residue sign and field map
- Resolved in scope: Evaluate local original Higgs heat identification and whole finite consumerRead resultRead result
- Resolved in scope: Execute whole variable bound Higgs reference and original scale mapRead resultRead result
- Resolved in scope: Execute whole inner Higgs scale/source and normal kernel transportRead resultRead result
- Resolved in scope: Execute given whole superconnection and normal spectral readerRead resultRead result
- Resolved in scope: Determine own-admissibility and whole total-chiral spectral readersRead resultRead result
- Resolved in scope: Derive whole scale-energy map,normal profile and relative flowRead resultRead result
- Resolved in scope: Execute original Green energy producer and mixed scale readoutRead resultRead result
- Resolved in scope: Match current action argument and common Higgs/gravity weightsRead resultRead result
- Resolved in scope: Execute whole original curvature consumers and Higgs radial sourceRead resultRead resultRead result
- Resolved in scope: Execute original whole four-ghost source and geometric type testRead resultRead result
- Resolved in scope: Execute original moving normal kernel derivative and whole source responseRead result
- Resolved in scope: Decide fixed original O1 source and normal operator placementRead result
- Resolved in scope: Compare whole Higgs mixture and covariance reader on invariant four-field witnessRead result
- Resolved in scope: Test exact bounded cutoff on whole ordinary Higgs volumeRead result
- Resolved in scope: Test whole original circle joint mode and IR Higgs normalizationRead result
- Resolved in scope: Test original O1 mode covariance against whole Higgs-law classRead result
- open: Reconstruct original localization from the whole process
- Resolved in scope: Test bare native-code word compression against actual localityRead result
- Resolved in scope: Decide original geometric local-time class and execute actual interval readerRead resultRead result
- Resolved in scope: Execute actual regional two-face partner and supported charged wordRead resultRead result
- Resolved in scope: Execute original color marginal, modular field law and complete class readerRead resultRead resultRead result
- Resolved in scope: Reconstruct common Higgs law from whole original quarter source towerRead resultRead resultRead result
- Resolved in scope: Execute original record action on Doily and ordered whole source responseRead resultRead resultRead resultRead result
- Resolved in scope: Locally implement original record process and test unchanged exterior sourceRead resultRead resultRead result
- Resolved in scope: Execute original elliptic insertion,whole source and causal responseRead resultRead resultRead result
- Resolved in scope: Evaluate actual joint Higgs and color group sourceRead resultRead result
- Resolved in scope: Execute whole original graph color reader with typed original center selectorRead resultRead result
- Resolved in scope: Execute original color fixed source and first inherited grading testRead resultRead result
- Resolved in scope: Execute actual original color-spinor CAR four-word and complete spin-sector sewingRead resultRead result
- Resolved in scope: Decide actual color admissibility of density operations and coordinate regionsRead resultRead result
- Resolved in scope: Execute actual whole seam-operation class and two-face responseRead resultRead result
- Resolved in scope: Execute entire original C6 word expansion with source amplitudeRead resultRead result
- Resolved in scope: Execute original collective Higgs force source and entire mean dualRead resultRead resultRead result
- Resolved in scope: Execute original all-mode force with actual time and whole sourceRead resultRead result
- Resolved in scope: Execute original local space/time force source and causal liftRead resultRead result
Origin reverse selection, field dictionary and original P1 kernel
What does reverse selection of P1/P2 give for concrete local fields and multi-field responses, and which identification with the original P1 kernel has actually been proved?
Observable reality: minimal conditions and counterworlds
Which operational conditions are independently required, which inequivalent models satisfy them, and which observable distinctions remain for selection?
Formal carrier core: unbounded Pascal uniqueness and finite glue
Which carrier and glue statements are already present in the papers and Lean sources, and which physical selection does not follow?
- Resolved in scope: Classify the unbounded Pascal proofRead result
- Resolved in scope: Classify the formal finite glue scopeRead result
Active mathematical program: marked seam monodromies and lattice lifts
Which marked seam/lattice transport geometries, lift classes and local-coefficient invariants arise from existing clock/reflection/quartic data? First complete case: sign lifts of fourJ representation on CP1 minusμ4.
- Resolved in scope: Define marked seam category and factor formulaRead result
- Resolved in scope: Completely classify quarter-clock four-puncture liftsRead result
- Resolved in scope: Determine central class and all subgroup restrictionsRead result
- Resolved in scope: Determine full G0 cocycle and classRead result
- Resolved in scope: Determine native4/5/6local cohomologyRead result
- Resolved in scope: Classify unrestricted G31 reflection monodromiesRead resultRead result
- Resolved in scope: Determine lift class beyond G0Read result
- open: Classify additional reflection/clock equivariance and mapping-class quotients
- Resolved in scope: Equivariant lifting and divisibility by eightRead result
- Resolved in scope: All62clock obstructions and central transport variantsRead result
- Resolved in scope: Actual group comparison and central pushout exclusionRead result
- Resolved in scope: Complete invariants and explicit collisionsRead result
- Resolved in scope: Compare E6 and E7 slices with the actual quarter clockRead resultRead resultRead resultRead result
- Resolved in scope: Classify original character-valued G31monodromy liftsRead resultRead result
- Resolved in scope: Determine E7-pair action on all original lattice fieldsRead result
- Resolved in scope: Completely connect E6/E7 cuts to the original compilerRead result
- Resolved in scope: Compare common covers and actual clock carriersRead result
- Resolved in scope: Prove shared representation consequence for48,4/3 and5/4Read result
- Resolved in scope: Completely decide joint compiler-field-cover constructionRead resultRead resultRead resultRead result
- Resolved in scope: Reconstruct canonical local compiler field source from C4Read resultRead result
- Resolved in scope: Eliminate redundant sector and multiplicity assumptionsRead result
- Resolved in scope: Classify native equivariant markingsRead result
- Resolved in scope: Classify pure quarter clock mapping class quotientRead result
- Resolved in scope: Determine complete cut algebra and lossless tetrahedron transformRead resultRead resultRead resultRead result
- Resolved in scope: Completely compare scalar glue and actual native compiler classRead resultRead resultRead resultRead result
Common clock sectors, quartic geometry and operational reconstruction
Which previously separate data of the original TFPT core follow from a common clock and representation geometry, and which complete finite measurement classification follows without asserting physical source selection?
Automatic joint origin hypotheses and source responses
Which simple joint rules connect the existing P1 source chain,double cover,information and compiler,and which whole candidate classes can be decided automatically using actual source consequences?
- Resolved in scope: Decide even-matter word class and check actual AI operator expressionsRead resultRead result
Existing TFPT derivations and correction of repeated gap diagnoses
Which common source/reconstruction chain already exists in the old original papers, and which purported global gaps arose from reducing P1 or choosing an optional CAR route?
Complete physical Hamiltonian source with Gauss sector and thermal word limit
Which whole source is constructed on the original local Hamiltonian route, how do physical constraints and thermal words follow, and how is its actual IR response distinguished from the original covariant geometric source branch?
Original TFPT source versus DET16 mirror vertex
Does the same original TFPT source produce the concrete DET16 generator and whole responses,or is a computable parent supplied as extra input?
Whole original source and canonical vacuum attachment
Which vacuum joins are already in the whole original source,and how do H ground source and R104 field/Gauss source join completely without second state choice or parent change?
Craig chiral measure and the original whole TFPT source
Which concrete operator and Berezin measure map preserves the original TFPT source when connecting Craig overlap measure?
- open: Compare original4D fermion Hessian and measure line with Craig
Cyclic quantum universe and original Genesis connection
Does original TFPT dynamics yield the exact cyclic quantum return in the September/October press lead and a geometric Genesis transition?
- open: Test periodicity and Genesis response on the same whole source
Physical constants as joint constraints on the TFPT source
Which independent constants constrain the original common source, and can one relative heat product supply gravity and vacuum energy together?
- open: Evaluate original volume, curvature and gauge responses together
Recursion, hypergraphs and mirroring at the original joint source
Which proposed structural ideas actually determine the original joint TFPT source, and which tests separate doubled representation from dynamical interaction?
Shared explanation of c3, P1 and P2 with recovered premise closures
Which formerly open prerequisites were derived elsewhere, how do c3/P1/P2 fit together, and why did the Atlas overview lose these connections?
Whole-theory status and composition of results since September
How does c3/P1/P2 reconciliation change the status and which existing results from the last two months jointly contribute to the full solution?
New constructive routes to the original common field integration
Which new source-faithful hypotheses can deliver the remaining actual field integration,and which first load-bearing identifications decide their suitability?
- Resolved in scope: Decide first concrete structural tests of new proposalsRead resultRead resultRead resultRead result
- open: Actually evaluate whole transverse force and coupled contacts
- open: Determine actual neutral P1 words and generator action
- open: Rigorously enclose the same primitive mixed response
- open: Evaluate specified eight-field word on original joint generator
- open: Actually evaluate primitive physical body short-time jet
Ursprünglichen gemeinsamen Kurzzeitkernel tatsächlich auswerten
Welche ursprünglichen Komponenten des gemeinsamen Kurzzeitkernels sind wirklich ausgewertet, welche alten Lösungen wiederzuverwenden, und wie wird damit der volle primitive OS Feldkernel gewonnen?
- open: Ganzen ursprünglichen OS Historienkernel auswerten
- open: Primitiven Kurzzeitjet mit ursprünglichen neutralen Wörtern abgleichen
- Resolved in scope: Tatsächliche Skalaronumparametrisierung an ganzer Quelle auswertenRead result
- Resolved in scope: Decide original Gaussian and scalar UV shortcutsRead resultRead resultRead result
- Resolved in scope: Test first dynamic-return, quantum-bound and stress-closure shortcutsRead resultRead resultRead result
Verifikationen wiederverwenden und ursprüngliche gemeinsame Feldquelle auswerten
Welche tatsächlichen alten Lösungen helfen beim primitiven Quellenwert, und wie führt die ungekürzte Originalintegration zur gemeinsamen Erklärung von c3,P1 undP2?