Skip to main content

Explore the foundations and current research.

Follow the published construction into its registered claims, then explore reviewed research questions, attempts and the connections that remain open.

Reviewed results

784 matching reviewed results

Established in scope

Historical alpha factors and definition steps reconstructed from original sources

In the question: Alpha: derived terms, unique root and physical EM identification

Source provenance and exact algebra under each stated normalization, carrier, primitive sector and defect response contract. No general nonderivability theorem, no retraction of the canonical circle defect line, marked D5 response or positive root uniqueness. No new physical selector or ledger promotion. Historical linear, exponential, quadratic and resummed openings are different calculation contracts; similar coefficients do not prove identical physical actions.

Read the exact result, assumptions and evidence

Result

Older originals give explicit factor provenance: V1.06 uses g=n/(8pi²), n=1 and g=8c3². ImprovedCubic of18September2025 gives linear backreaction1-2alpha; v2.7 derives exp(-alpha J) under additive defect coupling with J=d SF=2. In the later carrier gamma=tr_EY²=3/9+2/4=5/6 and B=rankE3/rankE2=3/2, so B gamma=5/4; family trace tr(S+)Y²=10/3 gives b1=41/10 for three families and one Higgs. The rank-one determinant yields (1-q)^(-5/4); its response q+(5/4)q²+(45/32)q³+... embeds the earlier two-defect coefficient in a fixed series. These factors must not be dismissed collectively as unexplained fits. Full identification remains narrower: v2.7 declares the CFE potential coefficients as supplied scheme inputs; v4.2 supplies P_loc'=alpha³-2c3³alpha² as a condition and defines Gamma by integrating the desired response. The master proof identifies its U(1) block with the already-defined EM action; it does not evaluate an original coupled Dirac determinant to obtain that F there.

Required assumptions

  • P1/P2 remain declared starting axioms

    This program checks which additional source, state, event, and observable structures follow from accepted TFPT principles; it does not revoke or replace P1/P2.

  • Model results remain conditional

    Calculations in a fixed E8 net, quotient, family packet, or readout apply only under their stated inputs and do not select those inputs.

Original evidence

finding:alpha-archive-term-provenance-and-master-functional-scope

Established in scope

EM origin: solved finite steps and precise remaining functional identification

In the question: Alpha: derived terms, unique root and physical EM identification

Source-reviewed status/type correction, not a new general nonderivability theorem or gate. P1/P2 remain accepted starting principles; being axioms is not an objection. The line is derived on the old circle, not an arbitrary vector to select again. v382 replay26October:6/6; literalTrue status checks do not prove open functional origin. Ledger Numerical and full physical status remain unchanged.

Read the exact result, assumptions and evidence

Result

Coefficient identities and the unique alpha root are retained. The old circle canonically supplies Pi and det_F(1-qPi)=1-q; for trace-class C-P the same relative factor survives exactly in every faithful KMS polarization class on that same circle. Actual full positive projection covariance fixes the whole CAR state without an extra Gaussian premise. The finite Quillen chain is beyond its older open summary: v985 resolves the finite mu4 channel swap; v995 closes finite KMS rigidity and state extension; v1014 checks the finite determinant-line restriction isomorphism and records reference A0. Do not reopen those steps. What remains is the original local EM source/operator map and relative real renormalized determinant norm producing the seam factor with response exponent5/4, coupling q(alpha), local variation terms and normalization in the same channel. Abstract continuum/Bismut-Freed identification and matching to the physical Thomson coupling do not follow from finite calculations. Chiral phase cancellation does not refute real EM susceptibility. EM.WARD.01 and ALPHA.QUILLEN.EXACT.01 retain their existing physical residual.

Required assumptions

  • Specified EM function with positive seam response

    F(x)=x³−2c³x²+(4/5)c⁶M log(p+q(1−q)^(−5/4)), c=1/(8π), p=1/(6π), q=48c⁴exp(−2x), M>0; original budget M=41. The function and inputs are premises here.

  • Model results remain conditional

    Calculations in a fixed E8 net, quotient, family packet, or readout apply only under their stated inputs and do not select those inputs.

  • P1/P2 remain declared starting axioms

    This program checks which additional source, state, event, and observable structures follow from accepted TFPT principles; it does not revoke or replace P1/P2.

  • Same original circle with trace-class changed polarization

    For the mathematical continuation retain H,B_a psi_n=(n+a)psi_n,0<a<1,u psi_n=psi_(n+1),P=1_(B_a<0),uPu*=P+Pi. C is a positive contraction with trace-class C-P; actual functional-calculus C_beta=(I+exp(beta B_a))^-1,beta>0 belongs to this class. Physical KMS/OS/EM source identification is not presumed.

  • Test a positive joint CAR source against the full geometric projection

    Consider an arbitrary normalized positive state on the specified joint charged two-face CAR algebra,without assuming quasifreeness or U1 invariance. The geometric target is the existing closed chiral annulus graph P_A with both marked faces,W=1/2 and original NS B_Sigma. Actual identity C_source=P_A is an explicit condition of the uniqueness theorem and an unresolved P1 source equation,not a fact inferred from geometry or RP. A finite error test applies only on a genuinely P_A reducing CAR block. Complete Dirac vector source,OS Padm and physical time are not identified with this chiral scalar target. No freely chosen purification supplies missing physical cross correlations.

  • Do not identify source types

    Observable algebra, OS reflection, state, collar operator, time evolution, carrier connection, family holonomy, and readout are distinct data until an original map relates them.

Original evidence

  • 007-source.tex lines 50–101

    Source checked at this snapshot

    Original location and fingerprint

    documents/tfpt_1_architecture_e8/sections/007-source.tex

    7e1cb59fef4de49deefe8f63b5d777e83528d0119e51191595784ee8c30dcd86

  • DIRECT-DEFECT-CLOSURE.txt lines 20–109

    Source checked at this snapshot

    Original location and fingerprint

    experiments/theory-contracts/original-admissible-source-closure-20261025/DIRECT-DEFECT-CLOSURE.txt

    84a79c74da8b18387a3d2d8a9928e4a437a608120b52a46c7ede6392cf1128ff

  • EM-MEASURE-AND-QUILLEN.txt lines 18–127

    Source checked at this snapshot

    Original location and fingerprint

    experiments/theory-contracts/original-admissible-source-closure-20261025/EM-MEASURE-AND-QUILLEN.txt

    a08abf23cab682b6c4733fb2403293b1de0245973864f77447544cde53422c65

  • status_ledger.csv lines 445–445

    Source checked at this snapshot

    Original location and fingerprint

    verification/status_ledger.csv

    8723b921bdc50a6157acc6bee4342b40586eb89bec6d7dcc0abc3309562c78b4

  • status_ledger.csv lines 752–754

    Source checked at this snapshot

    Original location and fingerprint

    verification/status_ledger.csv

    8723b921bdc50a6157acc6bee4342b40586eb89bec6d7dcc0abc3309562c78b4

  • KMS-AND-CARRIER-TRANSPORT.txt lines 38–159

    Source checked at this snapshot

    Original location and fingerprint

    experiments/theory-contracts/original-admissible-source-closure-20261025/KMS-AND-CARRIER-TRANSPORT.txt

    9efcfb0d68e16db842aab97b7171b2d667e7b065cb4c6ab8138102acc4c8fb68

  • PROJECTOR-STATE-RIGIDITY.txt lines 30–100

    Source checked at this snapshot

    Original location and fingerprint

    experiments/theory-contracts/native-arc-charge-source-interface-20261026/PROJECTOR-STATE-RIGIDITY.txt

    2e14e8875c263d71bd6bda61d005461cb718bdf30fdf34a6312db53167cd80c6

finding:alpha-exact-coefficients-and-root-retain-specific-physical-ward-obligation

Established in scope

The marked D5 grade response derives exponent5/4 from the same E8 source

In the question: Alpha: derived terms, unique root and physical EM identification

Exact response in the specified existing source, not a new field or fitted exponent. Does not derive physical preparation, u=48c3^4, q=exp(-2alpha), outer uq, baseline1/(6pi), or original EM instrument. Common time is not sector-resolved D5 readout. Replay26October2026:21/21; finite coefficient checks through degree12 do not replace the general series proof.

Read the exact result, assumptions and evidence

Result

Exactly G_u(q5,q3)=[(1-u)/(1-uq5)]^(5/4)[(1-u)/(1-uq3)]^(3/4). Hence G_u(q,1)/G_u(0,1)=(1-uq)^(-5/4); the common-time diagonal G_u(q,q) instead has exponent2. Powers follow from actual charge norms and the convergent oscillator series. Normalized local T5 insertion has Ward coefficient5/8. Fixed C/J do not generally preserve P5 but jointly transport charge and marking covariantly.

Required assumptions

  • Marked regularized E8 charged state and sector-grade response

    Existing positive E8_1 lattice vacuum source with original D5/A3 marking and 48 retained charges beta: beta^t P5 beta=5/4, beta^t P3 beta=3/4, beta²=2. The regularized charged vertex state has free preparation parameter u=r² in (0,1). N5,N3 are strongly commuting nonnegative oscillator grades; q5,q3 in [0,1] parametrize spectral readout. Keep original C/J matrices. u=48c3^4, q=exp(-2alpha), physical preparation, instrument and common time do not follow.

  • Model results remain conditional

    Calculations in a fixed E8 net, quotient, family packet, or readout apply only under their stated inputs and do not select those inputs.

Original evidence

  • PROOF.txt lines 26–176

    Source checked at this snapshot

    Original location and fingerprint

    experiments/theory-contracts/charged-sector-readout-clock-20261013/PROOF.txt

    26e6480a6304e4da5be96328e70f5f56c5bee1bfde7e58593a34a273016d09e0

  • checker.py lines 42–117

    Source checked at this snapshot

    Original location and fingerprint

    experiments/theory-contracts/charged-sector-readout-clock-20261013/checker.py

    bf949d11034c1d17322971b58c712c0bef01bb6a3d0e6aa63aeca6d7d41b45d6

finding:marked-e8-sector-grade-response-realizes-five-quarters

Established in scope

Existence and uniqueness of the positive root are proved

In the question: Alpha: derived terms, unique root and physical EM identification

Mathematical theorem for the fixed function; not a cubic polynomial because the seam response depends on x. No parameter or physical Thomson-transfer derivation; ledger Numerical unchanged.

Read the exact result, assumptions and evidence

Result

Log-convexity of the stated seam response and the sign before x=2c³ prove exactly one positive simple root globally. For M=41 its reciprocal is approximately 137.0359992168407. The analytic proof is distinct from the 10 rerun symbolic/interval checks. It holds for every M>0 and therefore does not select M=41.

Required assumptions

  • Specified EM function with positive seam response

    F(x)=x³−2c³x²+(4/5)c⁶M log(p+q(1−q)^(−5/4)), c=1/(8π), p=1/(6π), q=48c⁴exp(−2x), M>0; original budget M=41. The function and inputs are premises here.

Original evidence

  • PROOF.txt lines 1–76

    Source checked at this snapshot

    Original location and fingerprint

    experiments/theory-contracts/em-positive-root-convexity-20261013/PROOF.txt

    c1ad319037418e7745c287132c4065cf6d963af797c5a4c81f12273e486d7b50

finding:alpha-global-positive-root-unique

Conditional result

Minimal EM transfer is exact in its stated response contract

In the question: Alpha: derived terms, unique root and physical EM identification

Historical minimal-transfer definition with fixed readout; the single line has since been canonically reconstructed on the old circle. Neither this reconstruction nor independently proved root uniqueness is retracted. Original physical P1/EM mapping and renormalized Thomson observable remain separate.

Read the exact result, assumptions and evidence

Result

For the defined rank-one projector U_Sigma^min and stated parameters, T_Sigma=(1-delta_top exp(-2 alpha))^(-5/4) and the displayed scalar closure equation follow algebraically. This calculation does not independently prove physical selection of that projector, parameter set, or transfer to the Thomson readout.

Required assumptions

  • P1/P2 remain declared starting axioms

    This program checks which additional source, state, event, and observable structures follow from accepted TFPT principles; it does not revoke or replace P1/P2.

  • Model results remain conditional

    Calculations in a fixed E8 net, quotient, family packet, or readout apply only under their stated inputs and do not select those inputs.

Original evidence

  • 001-section-kernel-numerics-and-electromagnetic-closure.tex lines 95–150

    Source checked at this snapshot

    Original location and fingerprint

    documents/archive--tfpt-45--source_extracts--03_em_flavor_source/sections/001-section-kernel-numerics-and-electromagnetic-closure.tex

    5fdbdc1b7d8af7f85e5fc2435f567402b3dbcb96938951e58e633cf42549c7e2

  • DIRECT-DEFECT-CLOSURE.txt lines 20–109

    Source checked at this snapshot

    Original location and fingerprint

    experiments/theory-contracts/original-admissible-source-closure-20261025/DIRECT-DEFECT-CLOSURE.txt

    84a79c74da8b18387a3d2d8a9928e4a437a608120b52a46c7ede6392cf1128ff

finding:alpha-equation-is-fixed-input-closure

Established in scope

The 55/117 ratio is closed; absolute scale remains a separate anchor

In the question: Flavor ratio and absolute amplitude scale

Applies to the documented derived discrete stratum and c_u/c_d; it does not determine U_f* or absolute amplitudes.

Read the exact result, assumptions and evidence

Result

The active TFPT text states that Q geometry, det R=8, and rigidity of c_u/c_d=55/117 are established on the derived stratum; the continuous wall point U_f* is needed only for absolute amplitude normalization. The ratio is not an open monodromy/amplitude calculation.

Required assumptions

  • P1/P2 remain declared starting axioms

    This program checks which additional source, state, event, and observable structures follow from accepted TFPT principles; it does not revoke or replace P1/P2.

Original evidence

finding:flavor-ratio-closed-absolute-anchor-open

Scoped exclusion

The fixed marked M4 channel has no homogeneous GKSL logarithm for any positive integer power

In the question: Physical time and complete transfer

Only the specified M4 endpoint channel, positive integer powers, same system and homogeneous GKSL time. Intermediate covariance is not assumed. Positive GNS Hilbert transfer and classical B recovery semigroup remain valid; larger systems and time-dependent dynamics are not excluded. Contract remains PARTIAL and physical source derivation open; source review is not a fresh kernel/numerical run.

Read the exact result, assumptions and evidence

Result

For Phi(X)=7X/12+sum_{j=1}^5 Gamma_j X Gamma_j/12 on M4 with the specified Clifford matrices and 1+5+10 spectral blocks, no Phi^n for positive integer n is the exponential of a time-homogeneous GKSL generator on the same M4. The proof covers all logarithm branches using block traces and Clifford twirling; the forced canonical coefficient beta=n log(3/4)/16 is negative. This is a different channel from the shared S3 register hierarchy.

Required assumptions

  • Fixed marked M4 Clifford channel

    Five specified Hermitian Gamma_j on M4 satisfy {Gamma_i,Gamma_j}=2delta_ij I. The endpoint is Phi=7id/12+sum_j Ad(Gamma_j)/12 with spectrum 1,1/3,2/3 on orthogonal blocks 1,5,10. Comparison class is any homogeneous GKSL generator on the same M4 with exp(L)=Phi^n for positive integer n.

Original evidence

  • PROOF.md lines 15–53

    Source checked at this snapshot

    Original location and fingerprint

    experiments/theory-contracts/source-continuous-marked-time-search-20260922/PROOF.md

    62fd2844ecc3e84134d1400335cf4dd469312305d6cfb3eae427aba01beb0ac8

  • PROOF.md lines 65–132

    Source checked at this snapshot

    Original location and fingerprint

    experiments/theory-contracts/source-continuous-marked-time-search-20260922/PROOF.md

    62fd2844ecc3e84134d1400335cf4dd469312305d6cfb3eae427aba01beb0ac8

  • PROOF.md lines 164–188

    Source checked at this snapshot

    Original location and fingerprint

    experiments/theory-contracts/source-continuous-marked-time-search-20260922/PROOF.md

    62fd2844ecc3e84134d1400335cf4dd469312305d6cfb3eae427aba01beb0ac8

finding:marked-m4-channel-all-powers-homogeneous-gksl-excluded

Established in scope

Shared register hierarchy is homogeneously embeddable exactly for 2/9<=q<=1/4

In the question: Physical time and complete transfer

The entire specified finite shared-event family on the same registers; time-homogeneous GKLS generator in dimensionless step units. Source proof reviewed, without independent external peer review or fresh proof execution. Single-register continuation, enlarged environments, time-dependent dynamics and conformal/modular source time remain separate; no proof of fundamental discrete time or physical q selection.

Read the exact result, assumptions and evidence

Result

For the specified family Psi_N,q=sum_g w_g(q) Ad(u_g tensor N), 0<=q<=1/3, a consistent time-homogeneous GKLS continuation on the same registers exists iff 2/9<=q<=1/4. Necessity already follows on two registers using fixed sector projections, simple block spectra and conditional Choi positivity of the symmetric part of every possible generator; intermediate S3 covariance is not assumed. Explicit nonnegative rates construct the continuation for every N. q=0 is noninvertible; q=1/3 has a Choi-rank jump from five to six.

Required assumptions

  • Specified shared S3 register family and homogeneous GKLS time

    The specified six native words u_g act in each register by the same S3 representation; shared event weights w(q)=(1/2+q/6,q/6,q/6,1/18-q/6,2/9-q/6,2/9-q/6), 0<=q<=1/3. Seek a consistent time-homogeneous GKLS semigroup on the same finite registers with unit time step.

Original evidence

finding:shared-register-gkls-embedding-exact-q-interval

Established in scope

The same collar graph connects restricted state and time

In the question: Physical time and complete transfer

Conditional on charged CAR/Wick identification and the same graph covariance. No P1/P2 selection of physical statistics, normal length, marking or events. Existing quarter holonomy is retained; Clifford quarter-turn algebra is not a holonomy derivation.

Read the exact result, assumptions and evidence

Result

The second face of the supplied pure quasifree graph state has n=1−A=(1+exp(2ell B))⁻¹. Thus log((1−n)n⁻¹)=2ell B, without separately inserted occupations or a second time generator. This realizes the already known faithful KMS inverse through the full collar boundary relation.

Required assumptions

  • Complete data of both product-collar faces

    A selfadjoint B occurs in an exact normal-independent product equation. The full orthogonal L2 Cauchy graph projection of both labeled faces, their actual fiber identification and independently known positive normal length ell are supplied. Selection of these data from P1/P2 is not presumed.

  • Charged quasifree state for the complete graph covariance

    Additionally identify the actual field algebra with charged CAR(H direct_sum H) and the state with the gauge-invariant quasifree state whose occupation covariance is G_ell. This is an extra physical premise, not a consequence of the geometric projection calculation.

Original evidence

  • PROOF.txt lines 96–143

    Source checked at this snapshot

    Original location and fingerprint

    experiments/theory-contracts/seam-full-collar-reconstruction-20261015/PROOF.txt

    9f4effed34316798c6a35e1ac0ec2832cd3720180f476cb8747bb32359b56e6a

finding:two-face-graph-state-time-same-datum

Established in scope

Complete collar graph reconstructs the signed operator

In the question: Physical time and complete transfer

Exact spectral calculus for a supplied full product collar and known normal length. Without ell only ell B; no independent derivation of the original P1 kernel.

Read the exact result, assumptions and evidence

Result

The actual product equation gives T=exp(−ell B) and G=[[A,C],[C,1−A]], A=(1+exp(−2ell B))⁻¹. B=log(A/(1−A))/(2ell) reconstructs signs, magnitudes and operator frame. For unbounded T, T is the closure of C A⁻¹; the raw composition is defined only on D(T²). The executable reader needs no supplied B and rejects sign-only projections.

Required assumptions

  • Complete data of both product-collar faces

    A selfadjoint B occurs in an exact normal-independent product equation. The full orthogonal L2 Cauchy graph projection of both labeled faces, their actual fiber identification and independently known positive normal length ell are supplied. Selection of these data from P1/P2 is not presumed.

Original evidence

  • PROOF.txt lines 63–94

    Source checked at this snapshot

    Original location and fingerprint

    experiments/theory-contracts/seam-full-collar-reconstruction-20261015/PROOF.txt

    9f4effed34316798c6a35e1ac0ec2832cd3720180f476cb8747bb32359b56e6a

  • PROOF.txt lines 145–175

    Source checked at this snapshot

    Original location and fingerprint

    experiments/theory-contracts/seam-full-collar-reconstruction-20261015/PROOF.txt

    9f4effed34316798c6a35e1ac0ec2832cd3720180f476cb8747bb32359b56e6a

finding:full-two-face-collar-recovers-signed-operator

Conditional result

Full faithful KMS covariance or transfer reconstructs magnitudes

In the question: Physical time and complete transfer

Applies on a faithful finite KMS sector or the same gapped transfer sector; physical TFPT transfer remains unidentified.

Read the exact result, assumptions and evidence

Result

For known nonzero beta and faithful finite KMS covariance 0<C_beta<I, H=beta^-1 log((I-C_beta)C_beta^-1) is injectively determined. Alternatively, a full operator T=exp(-tau |H|), known tau, and [T,sgn H]=0 reconstruct the gapped H=sgn(H)(-log T)/tau. A population or eigenvalue list is insufficient; physical identification of TFPT transfer with this T must be shown separately.

Required assumptions

  • Known KMS scale or full transfer

    Positive dynamics reconstruction assumes either known nonzero beta and faithful finite covariance 0<C_beta<I, or the same full transfer operator T=exp(-tau |H|), known tau, and commutation with the sign; a spectrum alone or physical identification of the TFPT channel is insufficient.

Original evidence

  • README.md lines 55–106

    Source checked at this snapshot

    Original location and fingerprint

    experiments/theory-contracts/seam-state-dynamics-injectivity-20260918/README.md

    9b3d02af286051e4476b2bf079ae01abd97fe5634a10728521b09e8739c02e91

  • v258_dirac_covariance_induction.py lines 10–21

    Source checked at this snapshot

    Original location and fingerprint

    verification/v258_dirac_covariance_induction.py

    16c60e831dceba773f3629466895f1009654827286e5b760ae01bd755fd5c0b1

  • v258_dirac_covariance_induction.py lines 149–155

    Source checked at this snapshot

    Original location and fingerprint

    verification/v258_dirac_covariance_induction.py

    16c60e831dceba773f3629466895f1009654827286e5b760ae01bd755fd5c0b1

finding:full-faithful-kms-or-transfer-recovers-magnitudes

Scoped exclusion

Sign projector does not determine energy magnitudes

In the question: Physical time and complete transfer

Exact finite-dimensional counterexample for zero-temperature sign projection; refutes neither modular uniqueness for a fixed standard pair nor a complete TFPT source derivation.

Read the exact result, assumptions and evidence

Result

For C=(I+sgn H)/2, H_a=diag(1,a,-1,-a), a>0, gives the same fixed projector C and rho_0 but different positive energies. Thus [rho,C]=0⇒[rho,H]=0 is false without an extra premise. The counterexample concerns only inference from state/sign covariance to complete dynamics.

Required assumptions

  • Only sign covariance is given

    The conditional counterexample assumes C=(I+sgn H)/2 and [rho,C]=0, without knowing positive magnitude |H| or a complete transfer.

Original evidence

  • README.md lines 11–48

    Source checked at this snapshot

    Original location and fingerprint

    experiments/theory-contracts/seam-state-dynamics-injectivity-20260918/README.md

    9b3d02af286051e4476b2bf079ae01abd97fe5634a10728521b09e8739c02e91

finding:sign-projector-does-not-determine-time-magnitude