Skip to main content

Explore the foundations and current research.

Follow the published construction into its registered claims, then explore reviewed research questions, attempts and the connections that remain open.

Reviewed results

784 matching reviewed results

Established in scope

Operator synthesis implemented and calibrated on known cases

In the question: Automated construction of operator maps and sources

Supplied finite representations. Clifford monomial grammar and generic equal matrix dimensions up to16; not a complete operator-program, kernel or continuum search. Twelve generic Lean transport lemmas; concrete matrices checked separately and exactly.

Read the exact result, assumptions and evidence

Result

A CEGIS word search generates 2048 Majorana word/linearity classes and recovers the known five-mode particle-hole map. An automatically found imaginary mixing component eliminates the linear candidate. A second solver constructs simultaneous linear/antilinear intertwiners from exact operator pairs; evaluation identities include constraints, code and search configuration. These are software and recovery results, not new source selection.

Required assumptions

  • Explicit finite operator-synthesis inputs

    The recovery control assumes the given five-mode CAR representation. The inverse solver assumes explicitly supplied finite operator pairs and adjoints. The map is unknown; physical source selection is not assumed derived.

Original evidence

  • README.md lines 1–107

    Source checked at this snapshot

    Original location and fingerprint

    experiments/theory-contracts/seam-constructive-search-20261015/operator_synthesis/README.md

    db453a12d7a64e1a30988b61c6ff20ad80863ac8471a3c5a6eb735e876bc76e5

finding:typed-operator-search-calibrated

Established in scope

Spinor16 is a state sector, not a 16-real one-particle field

In the question: Which partner actually belongs to the original seam?

Representation types of the supplied free realization; no selection from P1/P2 and no new spinor-CAR replacement.

Read the exact result, assumptions and evidence

Result

D5_1 has ten real vector fermions; S± each contain 16 complex Ramond/spin-field states. Using S+ as an ordinary CAR coefficient would give c=16 and Spin(10) level 4. The documented c=8 connection uses 10+6 real fermions and mixed spin fields of weight 5/8+3/8=1.

Required assumptions

  • Original oriented exterior carrier

    Given E=C5=E3⊕E2, a Hermitian metric, volume orientation, S± and Y=(-1/3)^3⊕(1/2)^2. Internal carrier labels are not physical vacua; geometric seam reflection is not identified with carrier conjugation.

  • Supplied free D5+A3 realization

    Compare the documented free D5_1+A3_1 realization with five plus three complex fermions and spin-field sectors; realization by the raw P1 source is not presumed.

Original evidence

  • PROOF.txt lines 189–216

    Source checked at this snapshot

    Original location and fingerprint

    experiments/theory-contracts/seam-joint-conjugation-20261015/PROOF.txt

    bbea15f5ebb1dff698f1ecdfd8a18e724089c8fe9880dea684a5f9fd45cb1c8a

finding:joint-spinor-not-source-coefficient

Scoped exclusion

No time-stabilizing orthogonal repair of the fixed marking

In the question: Which partner actually belongs to the original seam?

Only fixed fold time and fixed 5+3 marking. Covariant marking transport is positively constructed; other sources or dynamical dictionaries are not excluded.

Read the exact result, assumptions and evidence

Result

After actual quarter conjugation the D5 projections of the time axis have distinct squared norms 129/256 and 137/256. Hence no orthogonal T satisfies T d_beta=d_beta and T O(P5)T^-1=P5. This excludes every Weyl correction in this fixed comparison.

Required assumptions

  • Given chiral source in both quarter domains

    D_alpha=-i∂theta on f(theta+2pi)=exp(2pi i alpha)f(theta), filled negative spectrum and relative particle/hole excitation time; alpha=1/4,3/4. This compares two conjugate domains, not opposite charges in one fixed domain or all P1 sources.

  • Stipulated E8 quarter-fold dictionary

    The existing Weyl lift M, affine E8 module, Q'=2(H3+H6) and K_alpha=L0+delta_alpha.H0 with alpha=1/4,3/4 are held fixed for comparison. This representation is not derived from P1/P2; an unbroken SM time action is not assumed.

  • First 5+3 marking and Z4 character supplied

    In the supplied E8 dictionary, D5 on the first five coordinates, D3 on the last three and k=2sum(p1..p5) mod4 are given for the first quarter domain. The other domain may transport these data covariantly; their original physical selection is not presumed.

Original evidence

  • PROOF.txt lines 153–187

    Source checked at this snapshot

    Original location and fingerprint

    experiments/theory-contracts/seam-joint-conjugation-20261015/PROOF.txt

    bbea15f5ebb1dff698f1ecdfd8a18e724089c8fe9880dea684a5f9fd45cb1c8a

finding:joint-fixed-time-marking-repair-excluded

Established in scope

Actual quarter conjugation transports the supplied marking

In the question: Which partner actually belongs to the original seam?

Exact map of the supplied source and conditional E8 lift; first marking, source realization and physical event law are not derived from P1/P2. Both quarter domains remain explicit; no switch to another branch to solve a fixed-sector question.

Read the exact result, assumptions and evidence

Result

n→−n−1 forces j→7−j and O=−MRM^T with O(x)=(x4,−x5,−x6,x1,−x2,−x3,x8,x7). O d_alpha=d_(1−alpha); P5_beta=O P5_alpha O^-1 and k_beta=k_alpha∘O^-1 need no new marking choice. Sea state and positive time are transported; the E8 current lift assumes the existing extension.

Required assumptions

  • Given chiral source in both quarter domains

    D_alpha=-i∂theta on f(theta+2pi)=exp(2pi i alpha)f(theta), filled negative spectrum and relative particle/hole excitation time; alpha=1/4,3/4. This compares two conjugate domains, not opposite charges in one fixed domain or all P1 sources.

  • Stipulated E8 quarter-fold dictionary

    The existing Weyl lift M, affine E8 module, Q'=2(H3+H6) and K_alpha=L0+delta_alpha.H0 with alpha=1/4,3/4 are held fixed for comparison. This representation is not derived from P1/P2; an unbroken SM time action is not assumed.

  • First 5+3 marking and Z4 character supplied

    In the supplied E8 dictionary, D5 on the first five coordinates, D3 on the last three and k=2sum(p1..p5) mod4 are given for the first quarter domain. The other domain may transport these data covariantly; their original physical selection is not presumed.

Original evidence

  • PROOF.txt lines 80–187

    Source checked at this snapshot

    Original location and fingerprint

    experiments/theory-contracts/seam-joint-conjugation-20261015/PROOF.txt

    bbea15f5ebb1dff698f1ecdfd8a18e724089c8fe9880dea684a5f9fd45cb1c8a

finding:joint-quarter-transports-marking

Established in scope

Bilinear sheet pairing is not Hermitian kernel selection

In the question: Which partner actually belongs to the original seam?

Correction of the finite selection inference; no identification of I with the actual Calderon operator and no P1 countermodel.

Read the exact result, assumptions and evidence

Result

CAR.PAIR.01 counts complex-bilinear singlets. The Hermitian scalar <f,g> already exists on S+; CAR.PAIR.02's 'scalar iff sheet-odd' inference is false in this reading. The previous J_C includes reversion signs and is fully Spin(10)-equivariant.

Required assumptions

  • Original oriented exterior carrier

    Given E=C5=E3⊕E2, a Hermitian metric, volume orientation, S± and Y=(-1/3)^3⊕(1/2)^2. Internal carrier labels are not physical vacua; geometric seam reflection is not identified with carrier conjugation.

Original evidence

  • PROOF.txt lines 39–78

    Source checked at this snapshot

    Original location and fingerprint

    experiments/theory-contracts/seam-joint-conjugation-20261015/PROOF.txt

    bbea15f5ebb1dff698f1ecdfd8a18e724089c8fe9880dea684a5f9fd45cb1c8a

finding:joint-bilinear-hermitian-correction

Established in scope

Actual partner map between quarter domains

In the question: Which partner actually belongs to the original seam?

Given chiral source. No selection from P1/P2, no equal responses within one fixed twist, and no identification with affine r0.

Read the exact result, assumptions and evidence

Result

n→−n−1, alpha→1−alpha gives C D_alpha C^-1=−D_(1−alpha). Particles become holes and conversely; normal charge reverses and positive excitation energy is preserved. The unique sea state maps to the other sea state without adding a zero vector within one domain.

Required assumptions

  • Given chiral source in both quarter domains

    D_alpha=-i∂theta on f(theta+2pi)=exp(2pi i alpha)f(theta), filled negative spectrum and relative particle/hole excitation time; alpha=1/4,3/4. This compares two conjugate domains, not opposite charges in one fixed domain or all P1 sources.

Original evidence

  • PROOF.txt lines 154–203

    Source checked at this snapshot

    Original location and fingerprint

    experiments/theory-contracts/seam-partner-original-action-20261015/PROOF.txt

    ff7c8dff8939e8380509bff5a34145f935407344a07bda1d65b7b25489a2677c

finding:partner-chiral-quarter-conjugation-state-time

Established in scope

Explicit conjugation for the existing sheet pairing

In the question: Which partner actually belongs to the original seam?

Representation with metric/orientation; J_C is not yet the actual boundary/OS conjugation. Two carrier labels are not two vacua.

Read the exact result, assumptions and evidence

Result

J_C=∏(epsilon_i+iota_i)K is antiunitary, exchanges S± and reverses Y. Exactly Lambda0 and Lambda5 have Y=0. J_C dGamma(h) J_C^-1=tr(h)I−dGamma(h). It is fully Spin(10)-equivariant. Reuse CAR.PAIR.01's bilinear pairing; CAR.PAIR.02's Hermitian selection inference has been corrected and is not evidence.

Required assumptions

  • Original oriented exterior carrier

    Given E=C5=E3⊕E2, a Hermitian metric, volume orientation, S± and Y=(-1/3)^3⊕(1/2)^2. Internal carrier labels are not physical vacua; geometric seam reflection is not identified with carrier conjugation.

Original evidence

  • PROOF.txt lines 116–152

    Source checked at this snapshot

    Original location and fingerprint

    experiments/theory-contracts/seam-partner-original-action-20261015/PROOF.txt

    ff7c8dff8939e8380509bff5a34145f935407344a07bda1d65b7b25489a2677c

  • PROOF.txt lines 39–78

    Source checked at this snapshot

    Original location and fingerprint

    experiments/theory-contracts/seam-joint-conjugation-20261015/PROOF.txt

    bbea15f5ebb1dff698f1ecdfd8a18e724089c8fe9880dea684a5f9fd45cb1c8a

finding:partner-original-carrier-cross-sheet-conjugation

Established in scope

Fixed quarter time splits the color/weak multiplet

In the question: Which partner actually belongs to the original seam?

Only the supplied affine dictionary. Backgrounds or time-dependent covariant symmetries have different premises; no general gauge-physics no-go.

Read the exact result, assumptions and evidence

Result

Mdelta=(-1/2,0,alpha/4,-1/2,0,(alpha-1)/4,-1/4,-1/4). The six (3,2) root energies are (0,1/2,1/2,1,1/2+alpha/4,1+alpha/4). K therefore does not commute with the fixed full SM action. The quarter phase is retained.

Required assumptions

  • Original oriented exterior carrier

    Given E=C5=E3⊕E2, a Hermitian metric, volume orientation, S± and Y=(-1/3)^3⊕(1/2)^2. Internal carrier labels are not physical vacua; geometric seam reflection is not identified with carrier conjugation.

  • Stipulated E8 quarter-fold dictionary

    The existing Weyl lift M, affine E8 module, Q'=2(H3+H6) and K_alpha=L0+delta_alpha.H0 with alpha=1/4,3/4 are held fixed for comparison. This representation is not derived from P1/P2; an unbroken SM time action is not assumed.

Original evidence

  • PROOF.txt lines 65–114

    Source checked at this snapshot

    Original location and fingerprint

    experiments/theory-contracts/seam-partner-original-action-20261015/PROOF.txt

    ff7c8dff8939e8380509bff5a34145f935407344a07bda1d65b7b25489a2677c

finding:partner-fixed-quarter-time-splits-sm-multiplet

Established in scope

Concrete pair operator; source neutrality is not hypercharge neutrality

In the question: Which partner actually belongs to the original seam?

Original carrier plus supplied E8 charge dictionary; no physical field identification.

Read the exact result, assumptions and evidence

Result

epsilon1 epsilon4 produces u1∧u4 in the carrier: Y=1/6 and source charge change0. Root operator, spinor carrier vector and affine root-current state have different types. The exterior unit is the internal nu^c label, not the affine vacuum.

Required assumptions

  • Original oriented exterior carrier

    Given E=C5=E3⊕E2, a Hermitian metric, volume orientation, S± and Y=(-1/3)^3⊕(1/2)^2. Internal carrier labels are not physical vacua; geometric seam reflection is not identified with carrier conjugation.

  • Stipulated E8 quarter-fold dictionary

    The existing Weyl lift M, affine E8 module, Q'=2(H3+H6) and K_alpha=L0+delta_alpha.H0 with alpha=1/4,3/4 are held fixed for comparison. This representation is not derived from P1/P2; an unbroken SM time action is not assumed.

Original evidence

  • PROOF.txt lines 13–63

    Source checked at this snapshot

    Original location and fingerprint

    experiments/theory-contracts/seam-partner-original-action-20261015/PROOF.txt

    ff7c8dff8939e8380509bff5a34145f935407344a07bda1d65b7b25489a2677c

finding:partner-carrier-charges-and-state-types

Scoped exclusion

No phase hit realizes the unchanged source

In the question: Constructive seam search: operators, state and source compatibility

Only the named unchanged CAR/QWZ representation with the same time. No TFPT no-go; choosing a state removes no added zero vector.

Read the exact result, assumptions and evidence

Result

All four hits add the same half-integer Cartan sectors and second K-zero vector. The already known integer-Cartan/ground-space obstruction therefore excludes equivalence to the unchanged source; positive algebraic extension remains possible.

Required assumptions

  • Fixed CAR source and adjoined half sector

    Ordered eight-channel cocycle, s=(1/2)^8, Q, quarter phase and K_alpha=N+|p|²/2+delta_alpha.p are supplied; alpha=1/4,3/4. Parity equivalence is in the global operator envelope without a separately marked physical X. Neither source nor extension is derived from P1/P2.

  • Unchanged specified CAR/QWZ source

    Compare the known quarter-CAR source or full mass=1, ny=8 QWZ operator with the identical Hilbert representation, Cartan action and physical time. Preserve its previously proved unique ground state and spectral gap. This does not compare all P1/P2 realizations.

Original evidence

  • PROOF.txt lines 85–197

    Source checked at this snapshot

    Original location and fingerprint

    experiments/theory-contracts/quotient-locality-e8-20261014/PROOF.txt

    dfa4b094f660d47bc28cf2729e1c12eb29ae0b79cdfda36e72cb40f9406f5714

  • SYNTHESIS.md lines 76–96

    Source checked at this snapshot

    Original location and fingerprint

    experiments/theory-contracts/seam-constructive-search-20261015/SYNTHESIS.md

    d112d0054cd1558c0a64f8aebfaa98c942beab9e5688cc9704d31b15cdacb252

finding:constructive-all-phases-fail-unchanged-source

Established in scope

The same shift functional hides distinct ground states

In the question: Constructive seam search: operators, state and source compatibility

Normal ground densities in the supplied K space; no state selection from P1/P2. The ground space was already known.

Read the exact result, assumptions and evidence

Result

All dual-invariant ground mixtures diag(a,1-a) on {0,r0} give the same shift functional. Original Cartan vacuum values select |0><0|; additional Rc invariance requires I2/2. These two conditions conflict.

Required assumptions

  • Fixed CAR source and adjoined half sector

    Ordered eight-channel cocycle, s=(1/2)^8, Q, quarter phase and K_alpha=N+|p|²/2+delta_alpha.p are supplied; alpha=1/4,3/4. Parity equivalence is in the global operator envelope without a separately marked physical X. Neither source nor extension is derived from P1/P2.

  • Positive base functional and explicit observable algebra

    For finite crossed words omega0 is positive; dual Z2 invariance is additionally required for unique algebraic extension. Comparing physical densities must retain the actual Cartan observables and the common normal ground space of supplied K.

Original evidence

  • SYNTHESIS.md lines 58–96

    Source checked at this snapshot

    Original location and fingerprint

    experiments/theory-contracts/seam-constructive-search-20261015/SYNTHESIS.md

    d112d0054cd1558c0a64f8aebfaa98c942beab9e5688cc9704d31b15cdacb252

  • PROOF.md lines 176–292

    Source checked at this snapshot

    Original location and fingerprint

    experiments/theory-contracts/seam-constructive-search-20261015/continuation/ground_state/PROOF.md

    b32a58aa4c3f1a30a78d25c88d5931898842ce67b8f75101f8f8de53a6332922

finding:constructive-state-algebra-resolution-and-source-test

Established in scope

E8 current group conditionally determines the P sign

In the question: Constructive seam search: operators, state and source compatibility

Only the stipulated even E8 lift; full odd-Z8 sectors remain additional. No transfer of the different (9,1) source. The ±i path orientation is not selected.

Read the exact result, assumptions and evidence

Result

In the supplied positive E8 module X=E_s commutes with SU8 root currents because alpha.s=Q(alpha)=0; oscillators are fixed. C=Z_e0 R gives CXC^-1=±iX and P sign+1. This is a direct global operator bridge, not X=Y(s).

Required assumptions

  • Stipulated even E8 completion with actual Klein signs

    Assume the E8 extension of the even D8 CAR sector constructed in seam-joint-ward-state, with original ordered cocycle, retained quarter transition and explicit P-lift convention. An ordinary-local inclusion of odd CAR fields is not assumed.

  • Fixed CAR source and adjoined half sector

    Ordered eight-channel cocycle, s=(1/2)^8, Q, quarter phase and K_alpha=N+|p|²/2+delta_alpha.p are supplied; alpha=1/4,3/4. Parity equivalence is in the global operator envelope without a separately marked physical X. Neither source nor extension is derived from P1/P2.

Original evidence

  • PROOF.md lines 29–178

    Source checked at this snapshot

    Original location and fingerprint

    experiments/theory-contracts/seam-constructive-search-20261015/continuation/current_group/PROOF.md

    f43ab51961cc19fb39dc2feab427463391d38962c4ba58276056787f3cae563a

finding:constructive-current-group-selects-positive-p-lift